Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11 “Interim Reporting (Topic 270)”. The Board is issuing amendments in this Update to improve the guidance in Topic 270, Interim Reporting, by improving the navigability of the required interim disclosures and clarifying when that guidance is applicable. The amendments also provide additional guidance on what disclosures should be provided in interim reporting periods. The amendments in this Update are effective for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, for public business entities and for interim reporting periods within annual reporting 3 periods beginning after December 15, 2028, for entities other than public business entities. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this ASU on its interim consolidated financial statements

 

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09 “Derivative and Hedging (Topic 815)”. Consistent with the original objective of Update 2017-12, the objective of this Update is to more closely align hedge accounting with the economics of an entity’s risk management activities. The amendments included in the five issues addressed in this Update are intended to better reflect those strategies in financial reporting by enabling entities to achieve and maintain hedge accounting for highly effective economic hedges of forecasted transactions. The five issues addressed are: Issue 1: Similar Risk Assessment for Cash Flow Hedges, Issue 2: Hedging Forecasted Interest Payments on Choose-Your-Rate Debt Instruments, Issue 3: Cash Flow Hedges of Nonfinancial Forecasted Transactions, Issue 4: Net Written Options as Hedging Instruments and Issue 5: Foreign-Currency-Denominated Debt Instrument as Hedging Instrument and Hedged Item (Dual Hedge). For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within those annual reporting periods. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06 “Intangibles-Goodwill and other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40)”. The Board is issuing this Update to modernize the accounting for software costs that are accounted for under Subtopic 350-40, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (referred to as “internal-use software”). Feedback from preparer and practitioner stakeholders on the 2021 FASB Invitation to Comment, Agenda Consultation, indicated that the accounting for software costs should be a top priority for the Board. Considering this feedback, the Board decided to make targeted improvements to Subtopic 350-40 to increase the operability of the recognition guidance considering different methods of software development. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim reporting periods 4 within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the potential effect of this ASU on its consolidated financial statements.

 

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 2, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 28, 2025
2023Feb 29, 2024
2022Mar 7, 2023
2021Mar 16, 2022
2020Mar 8, 2021
2019Mar 6, 2020
2018Mar 8, 2019
2017Mar 14, 2018
2016Mar 10, 2017
2015May 31, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.