NOTE 14.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

 

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09 (ASC Topic 740), Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. This ASU requires disaggregated income tax disclosures on the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. The Company is required to adopt this guidance for its annual reporting in fiscal year 2026 on a prospective basis but has the option to apply it retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. This standard is expected to impact the Company's disclosures and will not have an impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03 (ASC Subtopic 220-40), Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses. The Company is required to disclose, in the notes to the financial statements, specified information about certain costs and expenses. The Company is required to adopt this guidance for its annual reporting in fiscal year 2028, and for interim period reporting beginning the first quarter of fiscal year 2029 on either a prospective or retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. This standard is expected to impact the Company's disclosures and will not have an impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Sep 29, 2025Showing above
2024Sep 30, 2024
2023Sep 28, 2023
2022Sep 28, 2022
2021Sep 28, 2021
2020Sep 28, 2020
2019Sep 12, 2019
2018Sep 13, 2018
2017Sep 13, 2017
2016Sep 7, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.