Fair Value Measurement
For financial instruments that are subsequently measured at fair value, the fair value measurement is grouped into levels. See Note 2.
Our debt is recorded at historical amounts. The following table presents the fair value of our debt and derivative contracts at both December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024:
December 31,
2025
December 31,
2024
AssetLiabilityAssetLiability
2024 Term Loan Facility— 605 — 744 
2024-B Term Loan Facility— 684 — 904 
RMB Term Loan Facility— 57 — 58 
Senior Notes due 2029— 754 — 966 
Senior Secured Notes due 2030— 399 — — 
Australian Government Loan— — 
MGT Loan— 13 — 19 
Interest rate swaps33 — 
Foreign currency contracts— 18 
We determined the fair value of the 2024 Term Loan Facility, the 2024-B Term Loan Facility, the Senior Notes due 2029 and the Senior Secured Notes due 2030 using quoted market prices, which under the fair value hierarchy is a Level 1 input. We determined the fair value of the RMB Term Loan Facility utilizing transactions in the listed markets for similar liabilities, which under the fair value hierarchy is a Level 2 input. The fair value of the Australian Government Loan and MGT Loan is based on the contracted amount which is a Level 2 input.
We determined the fair value of the foreign currency contracts, natural gas hedges, and the interest rate swaps using inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly. The fair value hierarchy for the foreign currency contracts, natural gas hedges, and interest rate swaps is a Level 2 input.
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 20, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 19, 2025
2023Feb 21, 2024
2022Feb 22, 2023
2021Feb 22, 2022
2020Feb 23, 2021
2019Mar 16, 2020
2018Feb 28, 2019
2017Mar 1, 2018
2016Feb 24, 2017
2015Feb 25, 2016

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.