Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The Company performed a qualitative assessment as part of its 2025 and 2024 annual impairment tests (October 1 annual test date) for all reporting units except the reporting units specified below for which the Company elected to perform a quantitative assessment. The qualitative assessment included a review of the Company’s market capitalization. Based on results of the qualitative assessment for the 2025 and 2024 annual impairment test, the Company determined there were no indications that the fair value of a reporting unit was less than its carrying value; therefore, the Company determined that quantitative goodwill impairment tests were not required for all reporting units included in the qualitative assessment.
The Company performed a quantitative assessment as part of its 2025 annual impairment test (October 1 annual test date) for the Life Sciences reporting unit within the Packaging segment and the Norris Cylinder reporting unit within the Specialty segment, and in 2024 for the Life Sciences reporting unit, after electing the option to bypass the qualitative assessment. In preparing the quantitative analysis, the Company utilized both income and market-based approaches. The income-based approach was conducted using the discounted cash flow method, for which management updated its internal five-year forecast. Assumptions in estimating the future cash flows were based on Level 3 inputs under the fair value hierarchy. The Company also selected appropriate terminal growth rates as well as weighted average cost of capital rates, which considered various factors including the level of inherent risk in achieving the forecast based on prior history and current market conditions. The market-based approach considered comparable publicly traded companies and transactions within the industries where the Company's reporting units participate, and applied their valuation multiples to management's forecast estimates.
Based on results of the 2025 quantitative assessment, the Company determined there were no indications that the fair value of the Life Sciences and Norris Cylinder reporting units were less than their carrying values. Upon completion of the goodwill impairment test, the Company determined that the fair values of the Life Sciences and Norris Cylinder reporting units exceeded their carrying values by approximately 9%, and 64%, respectively, and thus there was no goodwill impairment. For the Life Sciences reporting unit, the Company notes that a 1% increase in the weighted average cost of capital would have resulted in a goodwill impairment charge of approximately $0.9 million, while a 0.5% decrease in the terminal growth rate would have resulted in no impairment to goodwill. For the Norris Cylinder reporting unit, the Company notes that a 1% increase in the weighted average cost of capital or a 0.5% decrease in the terminal growth rate would have resulted in no impairment to goodwill.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Specialty
PackagingProductsTotal
Balance, December 31, 2023$287,350 $6,560 $293,910 
Foreign currency translation and other(6,850)— (6,850)
Balance, December 31, 2024$280,500 $6,560 $287,060 
Foreign currency translation and other13,220 — 13,220 
Balance, December 31, 2025$293,720 $6,560 $300,280 
Accumulated impairment losses at December 31, 2025$58,660 $— $58,660 
Other Intangible Assets
For the purposes of the Company's 2025 and 2024 annual indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment test (as of October 1), the Company performed a qualitative assessment to determine whether it was more likely than not that the fair values of the indefinite-lived intangible assets were less than the carrying values for all indefinite-lived intangible assets except those for the Life Sciences reporting unit within the Packaging segment, for which the Company elected to perform a quantitative assessment. Based on the qualitative assessment performed, the Company did not believe that it is more likely than not that the fair values of each of its indefinite-lived intangible assets were less than the carrying values; therefore, a fair value calculation of the indefinite-lived intangible assets was not required for the 2025 and 2024 annual indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment test for all indefinite-lived intangible assets included in the qualitative assessment.
The Company performed a quantitative assessment as part of its 2025 and 2024 annual indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment test (as of October 1) for the indefinite-lived intangible assets for the Life Sciences reporting unit within the Packaging segment after electing the option to bypass the qualitative assessment. Significant management assumptions used under the relief-from-royalty method reflected the Company's current assessment of the risks and uncertainties associated with the cash flows of the respective underlying indefinite-lived intangible assets and represent Level 3 inputs under the fair value hierarchy. Upon completion of the 2025 quantitative impairment test, the Company determined there were no indications that the fair value of the Life Sciences indefinite-lived intangible asset was less than its carrying value. Upon completion of the 2024 quantitative impairment test, the Company determined that one of the Life Sciences trade names had a carrying value that exceeded its fair value, and therefore recorded an impairment charge of $0.2 million.
For the purpose of the Company's 2023 annual indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment test (as of October 1), the Company elected the option to bypass the qualitative assessment and performed a quantitative assessment for all of its indefinite-lived intangible assets except for the Aarts trade name, using the relief-from-royalty method. The Company performed a qualitative assessment for the Aarts trade name as it was acquired less than one year prior and has long-term sales projections consistent with those expected in the purchase price valuation. Significant management assumptions used under the relief-from-royalty method reflected the Company's current assessment of the risks and uncertainties associated with the cash flows of the respective underlying indefinite-lived intangible assets and represent Level 3 inputs under the fair value hierarchy. Upon completion of the 2023 quantitative impairment test, the Company determined that one of the Company's aerospace-related trade names had a carrying value that exceeded its fair value, and therefore recorded an impairment charge of $1.1 million, reported within the results of discontinued operations.
The gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of the Company's other intangibles as of December 31, 2025 and 2024 are summarized below (dollars in thousands):
 As of December 31, 2025As of December 31, 2024
Intangible Category by Useful LifeGross Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Gross Carrying
Amount
Accumulated
Amortization
Finite-lived intangible assets:    
Customer relationships, 5 - 12 years$99,270 $(71,810)$95,110 $(65,340)
Customer relationships, 15 - 25 years39,280 (39,280)39,280 (38,180)
Total customer relationships138,550 (111,090)134,390 (103,520)
Technology and other, 1 - 15 years13,630 (12,140)15,100 (13,500)
Technology and other, 17 - 30 years41,600 (39,740)41,600 (39,380)
Total technology and other55,230 (51,880)56,700 (52,880)
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trademark/Trade names45,740 — 43,700 — 
Total other intangible assets$239,520 $(162,970)$234,790 $(156,400)
Amortization expense related to intangible assets as included in the accompanying consolidated statement of income is summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year ended December 31,
202520242023
Technology and other, included in cost of sales$730 $720 $680 
Customer relationships, included in selling, general and administrative expenses5,950 5,800 6,160 
Total amortization expense$6,680 $6,520 $6,840 
Estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2025 is as follows (dollars in thousands):
Year ended December 31,Estimated Amortization Expense
2026$5,200 
20275,100 
20285,080 
20294,810 
20304,570 
Free Sentinel

Want the next TRIMAS CORP goodwill & intangibles disclosure the moment it drops?

Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment TRIMAS CORP's next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.

Track for free

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 2, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 27, 2025
2023Feb 29, 2024
2022Feb 23, 2023
2021Mar 1, 2022
2020Feb 25, 2021
2019Feb 27, 2020
2018Feb 28, 2019
2017Feb 27, 2018
2016Feb 28, 2017
2015Feb 26, 2016

About Goodwill & Intangibles Disclosures

Goodwill and intangible asset disclosures reveal the premium paid in acquisitions and how management assesses whether that premium retains its value. Since goodwill is no longer amortized under US GAAP, the annual impairment test is the only mechanism that adjusts carrying values downward — making the assumptions behind that test critically important for investors.

Key signals: a history of goodwill impairments suggests management consistently overpays for acquisitions. Watch the gap between reporting unit fair value and carrying amount — when fair value exceeds carrying amount by less than 10-20%, a small decline in business performance could trigger a write-down. For finite-lived intangibles, examine useful life assumptions across customer relationships, technology, and trade names; aggressive estimates inflate near-term earnings. Compare total intangibles-to-total-assets ratios against peers to assess acquisition dependency. Rising goodwill as a percentage of equity can signal balance sheet fragility.