Commitments and Contingencies
Indemnification
From time to time, the Company has entered into indemnification provisions under certain agreements in the ordinary course of business, typically with business partners, customers and suppliers. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company may indemnify, hold harmless and agree to reimburse the indemnified parties on a case-by-case basis for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified parties in connection with any patent or other intellectual property infringement claim by any third party with respect to the Company’s products. The Company maintains product liability insurance coverage that would generally enable it to recover a portion of the amounts paid. The Company has also agreed to indemnify its directors and executive officers for costs associated with any fees, expenses, judgments, fines and settlement amounts incurred by them in any action or proceeding to which any of them are, or are threatened to be, made a party by reason of their service as a director or officer (see “—Litigation” below). The Company also may be subject to indemnification obligations by law with respect to the actions of its employees under certain circumstances and in certain jurisdictions.
Non-cancelable Purchase Commitments
The Company’s contract manufacturers make advance purchases of components based on the instrument unit forecasts and purchase orders placed by the Company. To the extent these components are purchased by a contract manufacturer on the Company’s behalf and cannot be used by their other customers, the Company is obligated to purchase these components. In addition, certain supplier agreements require the Company to make minimum annual purchases under the agreements. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had commitments to make a total of $12.2 million in purchases over the next two years.
As of December 31, 2025, the Company had entered into non-cancelable arrangements for subscription software services to make payments aggregating to $18.6 million over the next four years.
Intellectual Property Licensing
The minimum commitments related to the Company's license arrangements aggregate to $24.9 million as of December 31, 2025 to be paid over the next 16 years.
Lease Agreements
The Company leases office, laboratory, manufacturing, distribution and server space with lease terms up to 10 years. These leases require monthly lease payments that may be subject to annual increases throughout the lease term. Certain of these leases also include renewal options at the election of the Company to renew or extend the lease. The Company evaluates renewal options at lease inception and on an ongoing basis and includes renewal options that it is reasonably certain to exercise in its expected lease terms when classifying leases and measuring lease liabilities.
In August 2025, the Company recorded $1.8 million in right of use asset and lease liabilities in connection with Scale Bio acquisition. See Note 3, Asset Acquisition, for details related to right of use assets and lease liabilities acquired. As of December 31, 2025, the Company recognized an impairment loss of approximately $1.3 million related to the ROU assets associated with the Scale Bio leased facility as a result of the decision to vacate the facility to optimize asset utilization and improve operational efficiency following the integration of existing operations.
For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, the Company incurred $12.5 million, $12.6 million and $13.6 million, respectively, of operating lease costs and $1.0 million, $0.5 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of variable lease costs. The variable lease cost is comprised primarily of the Company’s proportionate share of operating expenses, property taxes and insurance and is classified as lease cost due to the Company’s election to not separate lease and non-lease components. The sublease income for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, were $0.6 million, $1.2 million and $0.5 million, respectively.
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023 were $16.2 million, $17.8 million and $15.2 million, respectively, and were included in net cash used in operating activities in the Company’s consolidated statements of cash flows.
The payments due under of the Company’s operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2025 are as follows (in thousands):
Operating Leases
2026$15,630 
202716,805 
202816,394 
202914,800 
20309,853 
Thereafter29,537 
Total lease payments$103,019 
Less: imputed interest(18,658)
Present value of operating lease liabilities$84,361 
Operating lease liabilities, current$10,985 
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent73,376 
Total operating lease liabilities$84,361 
The following table summarizes additional information related to the Company’s operating leases:
December 31, 2025December 31, 2024
Weighted-average remaining lease term:
Operating leases6.7 years6.8 years
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases5.9 %5.8 %
Litigation
The Company is regularly subject to lawsuits, claims, arbitration proceedings, administrative actions and other legal and regulatory proceedings involving intellectual property disputes, commercial disputes, competition and other matters, and the Company may become subject to additional types of lawsuits, claims, arbitration proceedings, administrative actions, government investigations and legal and regulatory proceedings in the future. As of December 31, 2025, the Company has concluded that a loss is not probable and a contingent liability has not been recorded.
Parse
In August 2022, the Company filed suit against Parse Biosciences, Inc. (“Parse”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware alleging that Parse’s Evercode Whole Transcriptomics products and ATAC-seq products infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 10,155,981 (the “981 patent”), 10,697,013 (the “013 patent”), 10,240,197 (the “197 patent”), 10,150,995 (the “995 patent”), 10,619,207 (the “207 patent”) and 10,738,357 (the “357 patent”). In February 2025, the Court entered a consent judgment and permanent injunction against Parse with respect to the 995, 207 and 357 patents relating to ATAC-seq. Parse filed petitions for Inter Partes Review (“IPR”) of the 981, 197 and 013 patents which were found unpatentable by the Patent Trial and Appeals Board in February 2025. The Company strongly disagrees with those decisions and has appealed. The Court has stayed the litigation pending the outcome of the appeals.
In August 2025, the Company acquired Scale Bio. Scale Bio and Parse are parties in a litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in which Scale Bio is asserting that Parse’s Evercode products infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 10,626,442, 10,982,256, 11,512,341 and 11,634,752 (the “752 patent”) and Parse is asserting the Scale Bio’s single cell sequencing products infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 10,900,065, 11,168,355 and 11,427,856 (the “Asserted Parse Patents”). On February 13, 2025 the parties filed a stipulation agreeing that Scale Bio’s High Throughput Assay and methods of using such assays do not infringe the Asserted Parse Patents, and dismissing such claims. In October 2025, the Court entered summary judgment that the 752 patent is invalid. The Company disagrees with this decision and plans to appeal. In November 2025, the Court entered summary judgment that the accused Scale Bio products do not infringe the Asserted Parse Patents. Additional summary judgment motions are pending and a trial date has not been set.
Curio
In December 2023, the Company filed suit against Curio Bioscience, Inc. (“Curio”) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware alleging that the Curio Seeker Spatial Mapping Kit and associated products and services infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 10,480,022, 10,662,468, 11,001,879, 11,549,138 and 11,761,030. Trial is scheduled for May 2026.
In December 2023, the Company filed a request for a preliminary injunction in the Dusseldorf Local Division of the UPC alleging that the Curio Seeker Spatial Mapping Kit and associated products and services infringe EP Patent No. 2697391 (the “EP 391 patent”). In April 2024, the UPC granted the Company’s request and issued a preliminary injunction requiring Curio to stop offering, marketing, using or possessing these Curio Seeker products and services in Germany, France and Sweden. Curio did not appeal the preliminary injunction. On March 25, 2024, the Company filed a main request in the Dusseldorf Local Division of the UPC alleging that the Curio Seeker Spatial Mapping Kit and associated products and services infringe the EP 391 patent. In June 2025, the UPC found that Curio infringes one of the patent’s claims and issued a permanent injunction ordering Curio to cease and desist from selling the Seeker products in Germany, France and Sweden.
Illumina
In October 2025, the Company filed two lawsuits against Illumina, Inc. (“Illumina”) in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. In the first suit, the Company alleges Illumina’s announced spatial technology program infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 11,008,607, 11.549,138, 12,234,505 and 12,297,487. In the second suit, the Company alleges Illumina’s single cell kits and workflow infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 11,692,214, 11,932,902, 12,275,993, 12,305,239 and 12,416,192. Illumina filed its answers in December 2025 and an amended answer in the single cell suit in February 2026. No case schedule has been set.

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.