Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures.” Under ASU 2023-09, an entity is required to provide additional income tax disclosures on an annual basis, including disclosure of the disaggregation of income tax expense or benefit from continuing operations by federal, state and local, and foreign taxes; cash paid for income taxes by jurisdiction; and prescribed specific categories to be included within the effective tax rate reconciliation. The Company adopted the standard on a prospective basis and has included the required disclosures in Note 9.
The Company has determined that there have been no other recently adopted or issued accounting standards that had, or will have, a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 2, 2026Showing above
2023Feb 28, 2024
2022Feb 24, 2023
2021Feb 15, 2022
2020Mar 1, 2021
2019Feb 14, 2020
2018Feb 12, 2019
2017Feb 13, 2018
2016Feb 8, 2017
2015Feb 9, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.