Recently Adopted or Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”), which requires enhanced disclosures related to income tax rate reconciliations, including specified additional information and further disaggregation of reconciling items that meet a quantitative threshold. ASU 2023-09 also requires disaggregation of income taxes paid by federal, state, and foreign jurisdictions, with additional disaggregation for significant individual jurisdictions. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 effective for the year ended December 31, 2025 using a retrospective approach. Prior-period income tax disclosures have been recast to conform to the current-year presentation. The adoption of ASU 2023-09 impacted the Company’s income tax disclosures but did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

In  November 2024, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40) ("ASU 2024-03"), which provides guidance to improve the disclosures about a public business entity’s expenses. Public entities must adopt the new guidance for fiscal years beginning after  December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after  December 15, 2027. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of the adoption of ASU 2024-03 on the Company’s financial disclosures.

 

In  July 2025, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2025-05, Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets (“ASU 2025-05”), which clarifies the application of the current expected credit losses (CECL) model under ASC 326 to current accounts receivable and contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The guidance, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after  December 15, 2025, including interim periods within those fiscal years, and will be adopted prospectively, is intended to provide consistency in estimating expected credit losses for short-term receivables and contract assets. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2025-05 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows as the Company’s trade receivables primarily arise from product sales recognized at a point in time and are due from two large, established customers, both of which are third-party national specialty distributors, with short payment terms.

 

The Company has reviewed other Accounting Standards Updates recently issued by the FASB, and determined that none of these pronouncements will have a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

  

Free Sentinel

Want the next UroGen Pharma Ltd. new standards disclosure the moment it drops?

Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment UroGen Pharma Ltd.'s next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.

Track for free

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 2, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 10, 2025
2023Mar 14, 2024
2022Mar 24, 2023
2021Mar 21, 2022
2020Mar 18, 2021
2019Mar 2, 2020
2018Feb 28, 2019

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.