COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease Commitments
    See Note 8, Leases, for additional information about the Company's lease commitments.
Other Commitments
    See Note 3, Related-Party Transactions, for additional information about the Company’s commitments to dpiX.
    See Note 10, Noncontrolling Interests, for additional information about the Company’s commitment to the noncontrolling shareholders of MeVis.
    The Company has an environmental liability of approximately $3.2 million as of October 3, 2025. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, for additional information.
    The Company enters into purchase agreements with its suppliers in the ordinary course of its business for the purchase of goods and services. Some of these purchase agreements are non-cancellable and thus contractually obligate the Company to future cash payments. The Company has non-cancellable supplier purchase obligations of approximately $3.0 million as of October 3, 2025.
 Contingencies
    The Company did not have any material contingent liabilities as of October 3, 2025 and September 27, 2024. Legal expenses are expensed as incurred.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Nov 18, 2025Showing above
2024Nov 19, 2024
2023Nov 16, 2023
2022Nov 18, 2022
2021Nov 19, 2021
2020Nov 30, 2020

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.