Fair Value Measurements
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Note 1. Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies should be read in conjunction with the information outlined below.
The table below presents the valuation techniques and the nature of significant inputs generally used in determining the fair value of Level 3 Instruments.
Level 3 InstrumentsValuation Techniques and Significant Inputs
Debt and Equity SecuritiesRecent third-party investments or pending transactions are considered to be the best evidence for any change in fair value. When these are not available, the following valuation methodologies are used, as appropriate and available (i) Transactions in similar instruments; (ii) discounted cash flow techniques; (iii) third party appraisals; (iv) binomial option pricing models; and (v) industry multiples and public comparables.
Evidence of value in investees includes recent or pending reorganizations (for example, merger proposals, tender offers and debt restructurings) and significant changes in financial metrics, including (i) current financial performance as compared to projected performance; (ii) capitalization rates and multiples; and (iii) market yields implied by transactions of similar or related assets.
The tables below present the ranges of significant unobservable inputs used to value the Company’s Level 3 assets as of December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024. These ranges do not represent a range of values for any single instrument. For example, the lowest discount rate for a particular redeemable convertible preferred stock investment may be appropriate for valuing that specific debt security but may not be appropriate for valuing any other debt securities in this asset class. Accordingly, the ranges of inputs presented below do not represent uncertainty in, or possible ranges of, fair value measurements of the Company’s Level 3 assets.
Level 3 InstrumentsAmountValuation TechniquesSignificant
Unobservable
Inputs
Range of
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
As of December 31, 2025
Debt Securities
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock$46,024 Option Pricing modelDiscount rate
8.25%-21.68%
Volatility
39.98%-51.46%
Total$46,024 
Equity Securities
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock$15,000 Measurement alternative
Contribution to investment fund642 Measurement alternative
Private equity securities735 Measurement alternative
Convertible Preferred Stock6,268 Option Pricing modelDiscount rate
2.35%-2.94%
Volatility
51.46%-51.46%
Simple Agreement For Future Equity (SAFE)1,000 Measurement alternative
Total$23,645 
Level 3 InstrumentsAmountValuation TechniquesSignificant
Unobservable
Inputs
Range of
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
As of December 31, 2024
Debt Securities
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock$48,142 Option Pricing modelDiscount rate
9.01%-21.94%
Volatility
41.60%-66.30%
Total$48,142 
Equity Securities
Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock$15,000 Measurement alternative
Contribution to investment fund506 Measurement alternative
Private equity securities51 Measurement alternative
Convertible Preferred Stock5,477 Option Pricing modelDiscount rate
3.00%-16.71%
Volatility
44.96%-50.60%
Simple Agreement For Future Equity (SAFE)1,000 Measurement alternative
Total$22,034 
______________

As noted above, the binomial optional pricing model was used in the determination of fair value of Level 3 assets as of December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024. The significant unobservable inputs used in the binomial option pricing model are the discount rate or market yield used to discount the estimated future cash flows expected to be received from the underlying investment, which include both future principal and interest payments. An increase in the discount rate or market yield would result in a decrease in the fair value. Included in the consideration and selection of discount rates or market yields is risk of default, rating of the investment, call provisions and comparable company investments.
The following tables present a summary of the Company’s assets categorized within the fair value hierarchy, or accounted for under the measurement alternative, as of December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024:
As of December 31, 2025
(in thousands of USD)
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Equity Securities$— $— $23,645 $23,645 
Debt Securities— — 46,024 46,024 
Total$ $ $69,669 $69,669 
As of December 31, 2024
(in thousands of USD)
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Equity Securities$$— $22,034 $22,036 
Debt Securities— — 48,142 48,142 
Total$2 $ $70,176 $70,178 
The Level 1 equity securities relate to a contribution to investments in public equity securities that have readily determinable fair values.
The Level 3 equity securities relate to the Company’s investments in privately held companies through the purchase of convertible preferred stock, private equity securities, Simple Agreement For Future Equity (SAFE), contribution to investment fund and redeemable convertible preferred stock. For these equity securities, the Company does not have the ability to exercise significant influence on the investee, and therefore accounts for them as equity securities under ASC Topic 321, Investments in Equity Securities.
The Level 3 debt securities relate to the Company’s investments in privately held companies through the purchase of redeemable convertible preferred stock that meet the definition of a debt security.
The Level 3 equity securities include non-marketable equity investments without readily determinable fair values. The company has elected to account for these investments using the measurement alternative, under which the carrying value is measured at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for identical or similar investments of the same issuer. For the year ended December 31, 2025, there were no upward or downward adjustments resulting from observable price changes, and no impairment losses were identified or recognized for these investments.
The following table presents a summary of the changes in the carrying value of our equity securities measured using the measurement alternative for the year ended December 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024.
20252024
(in thousands of USD)
Beginning balance, January 1$16,557 $16,431 
Purchases844 1,000 
Disposition and Other— (773)
Net unrealized gain (loss)— — 
Currency translation differences(24)(101)
Ending balance, December 31$17,377 $16,557 
The below tables present a summary of changes in fair value of Level 1 and Level 3 assets by investment type (in thousands of USD):
Year Ended December 31, 2025
Level 1Level 3
Total
Equity
Securities
Equity
Securities
Debt
Securities
Debt & Equity Securities
Beginning balance, January 1$2 $22,034 $48,142 $70,178 
Purchases— 846 5,955 6,801 
Net unrealized gain (loss)(2)649 (9,252)(8,605)
Currency translation differences— 117 1,178 1,295 
Ending balance, December 31$ $23,646 $46,023 $69,669 
Year Ended December 31, 2024
Level 1Level 3
Total
Equity
Securities
Equity
Securities
Debt
Securities
Debt & Equity Securities
Beginning balance, January 1$16,109 $26,847 $48,277 $91,233 
Purchases— 1,000 — 1,000 
Consolidation inclusion— (776)6,522 5,746 
Net unrealized gain (loss)3,351 (949)(81)2,321 
Sales and settlement— (2,713)(19)(2,732)
Reclassification1
(18,702)— — (18,702)
Currency translation differences(756)(1,375)(6,557)(8,688)
Ending balance, December 31$2 $22,034 $48,142 $70,178 
1Relates to reclassification of Celsys, which was an equity security as of December 31, 2023, and became an equity method investee as the Company acquired the right to appoint directors during 2024.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 5, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 11, 2025

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.