Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06, “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software”. This ASU amends the capitalization criteria for internal-use software and requires entities to make certain disclosure of costs capitalized under this subtopic. This ASU also supersedes existing guidance on web site development costs. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. Prospective, retrospective, or modified transition adoption methods are all permitted under this ASU. We are currently evaluating the impact and method of adoption of this amendment.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets". This update provides a practical expedient that allows entities to assume current conditions as of the balance sheet date remain unchanged over the remaining life of certain current trade receivables and current contract assets when developing reasonable and supportable forecasts in estimating expected credit losses. We plan to adopt ASU 2025-05 effective January 1, 2026 and elect the practical expedient for applicable trade receivables and contract assets on a prospective basis. Adoption of the standard is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2024, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2024-03, "Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses". This ASU requires a footnote disclosure to disaggregate each relevant expense caption on the face of the income statement that includes specific natural expense categories. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of selling expenses on an annual and interim basis. The standard is effective in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. The standard is required to be adopted prospectively, but retrospective adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the method of adoption and the impacts of the guidance on our disclosures in future periods.
Recently Adopted Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures". The ASU is intended to improve income tax disclosure requirements, primarily through additional disclosures about a reporting entity’s effective tax rate reconciliations as well as information on income taxes paid. The standard became effective for Xylem for the annual reporting period beginning January 1, 2025, which we adopted prospectively. The disclosures related to our adoption of the amendment are included in Note 7, "Income Taxes."
Free Sentinel

Want the next Xylem Inc. new standards disclosure the moment it drops?

Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment Xylem Inc.'s next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.

Track for free

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 25, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 3, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024
2022Feb 24, 2023
2021Feb 25, 2022
2020Feb 26, 2021
2019Feb 28, 2020
2018Feb 22, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Feb 23, 2017
2015Feb 26, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.