Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (Topic 740). The ASU requires disaggregated information about a reporting entity’s effective tax rate reconciliation as well as additional information on income taxes paid. The Company adopted ASU No. 2023-09 as of December 31, 2025 on a prospective basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted
In December 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03: Income Statement--Reporting Comprehensive Income--Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), which requires additional disclosures about specific types of expenses included in the expense captions presented on the face of the income statement as well as disclosures about selling expenses. In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01, which clarifies the effective date of ASU 2024-03. ASU 2024-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. This ASU should be applied prospectively with the option to apply the standard retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of this ASU.

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which provides entities with a practical expedient that assumes that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset in developing reasonable
and supportable forecasts as part of estimating expected credit losses. ASU 2025-05 is effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the disclosure impact.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-10 – Government Grants which establishes guidance on the recognition, measurement, and presentation of government grants received by business entities. The new guidance leverages the principles in the accounting framework for government assistance in International Accounting Standard 20 "Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance". This ASU is effective for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2028 and interim reporting periods within those annual periods. This ASU may be applied prospectively or retrospectively to any or all periods presented in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Early adoption of this ASU is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this ASU may have on its consolidated financial statements.
Free Sentinel

Want the next ACM Research, Inc. new standards disclosure the moment it drops?

Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment ACM Research, Inc.'s next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.

Track for free

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 2, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 3, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024
2022Mar 2, 2023
2021Mar 1, 2022
2020Mar 1, 2021
2019Mar 24, 2020
2018Mar 14, 2019
2017Mar 23, 2018

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.