Fair Value Measurement
The fair value hierarchy is based on inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity's pricing based upon their own market assumptions. The fair value hierarchy consists of the following three levels:
Level I—Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level II—Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
Level III—Instruments whose significant value drivers are unobservable.
The following table presents for each of these hierarchy levels, the Company's financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2025 and 2024:
(In thousands)Level ILevel IILevel IIITotal
At December 31, 2025:
Assets:
Cash equivalents$85,176 $— $— $85,176 
Foreign currency derivatives— 9,531 — 9,531 
Liabilities:
Foreign currency derivatives— 6,401 — 6,401 
At December 31, 2024:
Assets:
Cash equivalents$250,841 $— $— $250,841 
Foreign currency derivatives— 4,889 — 4,889 
Liabilities:
Foreign currency derivatives— 2,330 — 2,330 
The Company's cash equivalents (comprised of money market mutual funds) are classified within Level I of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices.
The Company's foreign currency derivatives are classified within Level II of the fair value hierarchy as their fair values are determined based on a market approach valuation technique that uses readily observable market parameters and the consideration of counterparty risk.
Fair value measurements are also used in nonrecurring valuations performed in connection with impairment testing, including the valuation of program rights, goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment. All of our nonrecurring valuations use significant unobservable inputs and therefore fall under Level III of the fair value hierarchy.
Credit Facility Debt and Senior Notes
The fair values of each of the Company's debt instruments are based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates offered to the Company for instruments of the same remaining maturities.
The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments, excluding those that are carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets are summarized as follows:
(In thousands)December 31, 2025
Carrying
Amount
Estimated
Fair Value
Debt instruments:
Term Loan A Facility$79,438 $82,795 
10.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2029
864,459 916,563 
4.25% Senior Notes due 2029
274,630 242,810 
4.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2029
140,383 127,830 
10.50% Senior Secured Notes due July 2032
393,383 442,000 
$1,752,293 $1,811,998 
(In thousands)December 31, 2024
Carrying
Amount
Estimated
Fair Value
Debt instruments:
Term Loan A facility$359,660 $356,934 
10.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2029
861,683 927,500 
4.25% Senior Notes due 2029
975,466 772,002 
4.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2029
139,410 142,313 
$2,336,219 $2,198,749 
Fair value estimates related to the Company's debt instruments presented above are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgments and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 11, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 14, 2025
2023Feb 9, 2024
2022Feb 17, 2023
2021Feb 16, 2022
2020Feb 26, 2021
2019Feb 27, 2020
2018Mar 1, 2019
2017Mar 1, 2018
2016Feb 24, 2017
2015Feb 25, 2016

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.