RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (Topic 740), which requires companies to disaggregate information about their effective tax rate reconciliation as well as information on income taxes paid. The standard applies to all entities subject to income taxes. The standard becomes effective for public entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2024. We adopted this standard prospectively for the annual period ended December 31, 2025. This guidance did not have an impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, although it did result in expanded reportable disclosures. See Note 10 — Income Taxes in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for further detail.

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-05, Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which provides a practical expedient to assume that, for estimating expected credit losses, current conditions as of the balance sheet date will remain constant through the remaining life of the assets. The practical expedient is available to all entities. The standard becomes effective for all entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025. We are currently evaluating this standard and the potential effects of these changes to our consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2023Feb 26, 2024
2022Feb 27, 2023
2021Mar 14, 2022

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.