Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. Commitments Disclosure
Note 10. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
In February 2023, the Company entered into a Sublease for the previous office space located at One World Trade Center.
In January 2025, the Company entered into an amended sublease agreement (the “First Amendment”) to terminate the existing space in its corporate office and commence occupancy of different space within the same building. The First Amendment was treated as a lease modification to the Sublease which resulted in the recognition of a gain on modification of $2.3 million which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses. The Company also recorded a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability of $23.9 million during the first quarter of fiscal year 2025. Based on the Company’s past experience and current expectations for administrative office needs, the Company determined the lease term to be approximately six years. As of December 31, 2025, the remaining lease term for the Company’s operating lease was 5.3 years with the discount rate of 7.12%. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not readily determinable and as such, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the lease commencement date, which represents an internally developed rate that would be incurred to borrow, on a collateralized basis, over a similar term, an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment.
The Company entered into a fleet lease program beginning the first quarter of 2024. The lease agreement includes an initial 12-month noncancelable period with monthly renewal options thereafter. Lease terms range from approximately 40 to 50 months and are classified as finance leases. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recognized a right-of-use asset and lease liability, both, of $4.5 million in connection to this lease. As of December 31, 2025, and lease liability related to the finance lease were $6.6 million and $6.8 million, respectively, and the weighted average remaining lease term was 2.8 years, with a weighted average discount rate of 9.6%.
Lease expenses recognized were as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|||||||||
|
|
2025 |
|
|
2024 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|||
Operating lease expense |
|
$ |
4,740 |
|
|
$ |
2,331 |
|
|
$ |
2,173 |
|
Finance lease expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Amortization of right-of-use assets |
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Interest on lease liabilities |
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Future minimum lease payments of the Company’s leases as of December 31, 2025, were as follows:
|
|
Operating lease |
|
|
Finance lease |
|
||
2026 |
|
$ |
2,028 |
|
|
$ |
3,056 |
|
2027 |
|
|
4,791 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
2028 |
|
|
4,807 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
2029 |
|
|
11,284 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
2030 |
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total lease payments |
|
|
29,227 |
|
|
|
7,633 |
|
Less: imputed interest |
|
|
(5,611 |
) |
|
|
(882 |
) |
Present value of lease liabilities |
|
$ |
23,616 |
|
|
$ |
6,751 |
|
Legal Proceedings
The Company may be involved in various claims, litigation and legal proceedings from time to time. On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews the status of each significant matter and assesses its potential financial exposure. Because of uncertainties related to claims, litigation and legal proceedings, accruals are based on the Company’s best estimates based on available information. The Company records accruals for outstanding legal matters if a matter is both probable to result in material liability and the amount of loss or a range of possible loss can be reasonably estimated. If a loss contingency is not both probable and reasonably estimable, the Company does not establish an accrued liability.
Securities Class Action
On May 13, 2022, Evy Gru filed a putative class action complaint captioned Gru v. Axsome Therapeutics, Inc., et al. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, or the SDNY District Court, against the Company and certain of its current and former officers and one director, which the Company refers to as the Securities Class Action. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and alleges, among other things, that the defendants made false statements and omissions concerning the Company’s chemistry manufacturing and controls practices, and its NDA with the FDA, with respect to one of its then product candidates, AXS-07, now SYMBRAVO. The named plaintiff sought unspecified damages, fees, interest, and costs. On August 11, 2022, the SDNY District Court appointed co-lead plaintiffs in the Securities Class Action, one of whom later withdrew. On October 7, 2022, the Securities Class Action plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, which contained substantially similar allegations as in the initial complaint. On September 25, 2023, the SDNY District Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
On October 13, 2023, plaintiffs’ counsel filed a letter seeking leave to file an amended complaint and to substitute new plaintiffs. On January 22, 2024, the SDNY District Court granted that motion and ordered that the case name be changed to In re Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. Securities Litigation. On January 26, 2024, the replacement plaintiffs renewed their request for leave to file a proposed second amended complaint, and, on February 6, 2024, the SDNY District Court granted that request. Plaintiffs filed the second amended complaint on February 7, 2024. On March 11, 2024, the defendants moved to dismiss the second amended complaint. On March 31, 2025, the SDNY District Court entered an order granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motions to dismiss, dismissing plaintiffs’ claims against three of Axsome’s current and former officers and allowing the claims against the Company and two current officers to proceed. On October 27, 2025, the SDNY District Court preliminarily approved the terms of a settlement resolving the Securities Class Action. On February 10, 2026, the SDNY District Court conducted a hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for final approval of the settlement and the parties are awaiting the Court’s decision.
Stockholder Derivative Action
On July 21, 2022, Daniel Engel filed a stockholder derivative complaint captioned Engel v. Herriot Tabuteau, et al. in the SDNY District Court against the Company’s then-current directors, certain of the Company’s current and former officers, and the Company (as nominal defendant). On January 27, 2023, Kyle Guterba filed a stockholder derivative complaint captioned Guterba v. Tabuteau, et al. in the SDNY District Court against the Company’s then-current directors, certain of the Company’s current and former officers, and the Company (as nominal defendant). The SDNY derivative complaints arise out of similar allegations as those made in the Securities Class Action. The plaintiffs assert claims for breach of fiduciary duties against all of the defendants and for contribution for violations of Section 10(b) and 21D of the Exchange Act. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, fees, interest, and costs, as well as corporate governance changes. The Engel and Guterba matters were consolidated on February 28, 2023 and were stayed pending further proceedings in the Securities Class Action. On November 25, 2025, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On February 13, 2026, the defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint. The plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to the motion to dismiss is March 9, 2026.
On September 23, 2025, John Wickstrom filed a stockholder derivative complaint captioned Wickstrom v. Herriot Tabuteau, et al. in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against the Company’s current directors, certain of the Company’s current and former officers, and the Company (as nominal defendant). On September 29, 2025, John Gildea filed a stockholder derivative complaint captioned Gildea v. Herriot Tabuteau, et al. in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against the Company’s current directors, certain of the Company’s current and former officers, and the Company (as nominal defendant). The Delaware derivative complaints arise out of similar allegations as those made in the Securities Class Action and the SDNY derivative action. The plaintiffs assert claims for breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, and corporate waste against all of the defendants. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, fees, interest, and costs, as well as corporate governance changes. On November 6, 2025, the court consolidated the actions and designated the complaint in the Wickstrom action as the operative complaint. On February 2, 2026, the defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. The plaintiffs’ deadline to respond to the motion to dismiss is March 19, 2026.
SUNOSI Paragraph IV Litigation
On September 13, 2023, the Company commenced a patent infringement action against Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (“Hikma”) and five other drug companies relating to each defendant’s ANDA for SUNOSI. This action is captioned Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Alkem Laboratories Ltd., et al. No. 2:23-cv-20354 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, or the NJ District Court. The Company commenced related patent infringement actions against the defendants relating to their ANDAs on December 20, 2023, January 11, 2024, January 18, 2024, February 14, 2024, March 19, 2024 (2 actions filed), April 5, 2024, July 2, 2024, August 8, 2024, August 21, 2024, September 16, 2024, November 20, 2024 (4 actions filed), January 21, 2025, January 29, 2025, May 1, 2025, August 15, 2025, November 12, 2025, and November 14, 2025. Those actions are captioned Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Unichem Laboratories Ltd. No. 2:23-cv-23255; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Hetero USA, Inc. et al. No. 2:24-cv-00196; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al. No. 2:24-cv-00309; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. No. 2:24-cv-00860; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Hetero USA, Inc. et al. No. 2:24-cv-03999; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al. No. 2:24-cv-04002; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Alkem Laboratories Ltd., et al. No. 2:24-cv-04608; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al. No. 2-24-cv-07511; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Alkem Laboratories Ltd. No. 2-24-cv-08365; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al. No. 2-24-cv-08624; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Alkem Laboratories Ltd. et al. No. 2-24-cv-09209; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Alkem Laboratories Ltd. No. 2-24-cv-10617; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Hetero USA, Inc. et al. No. 2:24-cv-10618; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al. No. 2:24-cv-10619; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. No. 2:24-cv-10620; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al. No. 2:25-cv-00643; Axsome Malta Ltd. et al v. Hetero USA Inc. et al. No. 2-25-cv-00801; Axsome Malta Ltd. & Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al. No. 2-25-cv-03721; Axsome Malta Ltd. et al v. Alkem Laboratories Ltd. No. 2-25-cv-14694; Axsome Malta Ltd. et al v. Alkem Laboratories Ltd. No. 2-25-cv-17395; and Axsome Malta Ltd. et al. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. et al. 2-25-cv-17592, respectively, all of which were filed in the NJ District Court.
On June 4, 2024, Axsome and Axsome Malta Ltd. (the “Malta Subsidiary”) entered into a settlement agreement with Unichem Laboratories Ltd. (“Unichem”) under which agreement Unichem agreed not to launch its generic solriamfetol product until June 30, 2042, or earlier under certain circumstances. On August 21, 2024, Axsome and the Malta Subsidiary reached an agreement to dismiss the actions pending against Sandoz Inc. On September 25, 2024, Hikma filed a petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Patent No. 11,560,354 before the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board. That petition was captioned Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. f/k/a West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. Axsome Malta Ltd. IPR2024-01418. On March 2, 2025, Axsome and the Malta Subsidiary entered into a settlement agreement with Hikma under which agreement Hikma agreed not to launch its generic solriamfetol product until September 1, 2040, if pediatric exclusivity is granted for SUNOSI, or on or after March 1, 2040, if no pediatric exclusivity is granted, or earlier under certain circumstances. On March 6, 2025 the Malta Subsidiary and Hikma jointly requested that the PTAB dismiss IPR2024-01418. That request was granted on March 12, 2025. On May 21, 2025, Axsome and the Malta Subsidiary entered into a settlement with Hetero USA, Inc., Hetero Labs Limited Unit-V, and Hetero Labs Ltd. (collectively, “Hetero”) under which agreement Hetero agreed not to launch its generic solriamfetol product until September 1, 2040, if pediatric exclusivity is granted for SUNOSI, or on or after March 1, 2040, if no pediatric exclusivity is granted, or earlier under certain circumstances. On February 13, 2026, Axsome and the Malta Subsidiary entered into a settlement with Alkem Laboratories Ltd. (“Alkem”) under which agreement Alkem agreed not to launch its generic solriamfetol product until September 1, 2040, if pediatric exclusivity is granted for SUNOSI, or on or after March 1, 2040, if no pediatric exclusivity is granted, or earlier under certain circumstances. All other actions remain pending and are in fact discovery.
SYMBRAVO Paragraph IV Litigation
On September 26, 2025, the Company commenced a patent infringement action against Apotex Inc. relating to Apotex’s ANDA for SYMBRAVO. This action is captioned Axsome Therapeutics, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc., No. 1:25-cv-16038 in the NJ District Court. The Court has not yet set a schedule for the action.
The Company believes that its assertions in pending legal proceedings have merit and does not believe that any of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its financial position. As of December 31, 2025, there were no potential material losses from claims, asserted or unasserted, or legal proceedings that the Company determined were both probable and reasonably estimable.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Feb 23, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Feb 18, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Feb 23, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Feb 28, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 1, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 1, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 12, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 15, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 7, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 7, 2017 | |
About Commitments Disclosures
Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.
Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.