Note 20 - Commitments and Contingencies
The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with the Company’s officers and directors for certain events or occurrences. The Company maintains a directors and officers insurance policy to provide coverage in the event of a claim against an officer or director.
Litigation
We are subject to various legal proceedings, claims, and governmental inspections, audits or investigations arising out of our business which cover matters such as general commercial, consumer protection, governmental regulations, product liability, privacy, safety, environmental, intellectual property, employment and other actions that are incidental to our business.
These actions frequently seek putative damages that may significantly exceed our assessment of any reasonably possible loss from the resolution of such actions. We record a liability for legal claims when the Company determines that a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, and, if the liability is material, we disclose the amount of the liability reserved.
These matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and it is possible that an unfavorable outcome of one or more of these legal proceedings or other contingencies could have a material impact on the business, financial condition, or results of operations of the Company.
From time to time, the Company is subject to patent litigations asserted by non-practicing entities.
Legal expenses are included in “General and administrative expense” in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the Company determined that no provision was required, as management’s best estimate of any probable loss related to litigation was nil. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company paid $1.2 million to settle litigation matters, which amount is accordingly no longer reflected in the provision as of December 31, 2025.
Purchase Commitments
On December 12, 2025, the Company amended an agreement with one of its third-party service providers related to cloud services. Under the amended terms, the Company is committed to pay a minimum of $56.0 million over five consecutive years beginning in December 2025. If the Company fails to meet a minimum annual commitment in any period or upon early termination as defined in the agreement, the Company will be required to pay any unsatisfied minimum commitment amounts, subject to certain rollover provisions. As of December 31, 2025, the minimum commitment remaining with this third-party was $55.2 million. In addition, the Company has an agreement with another third-party service provider related to cloud services, under which the Company is committed to pay a total of $12.4 million over a period of 36 months beginning October 2024. At the end of the 36 months or upon early termination as defined in the agreement, any unused consumption capacity will expire unless a renewal agreement is executed. As of December 31, 2025, the total commitment fee remaining with this third-party was $4.4 million.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 16, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 28, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024
2022Feb 28, 2023
2021Mar 16, 2022

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.