Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, to improve disclosures about a public entity's reportable segments through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. The Company adopted this new accounting guidance on a retrospective basis on January 1, 2024, and the adoption did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, to improve disclosures about a company's income taxes paid and the effective rate reconciliation table. The Company adopted this new accounting guidance on a retrospective basis on January 1, 2025, and the adoption did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, to provide additional disclosure about the nature of a company's expenses included in the income statement. The guidance in this update will be effective for public companies for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of adopting this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which amends ASC 326-20 to provide a practical expedient and an accounting policy election (for all entities other than public business entities that elect the practical expedient) related to the estimation of expected credit losses for current accounts receivable and current contract assets that arise from transactions accounted for under ASC 606. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2026, and the adoption did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Targeted Improvement to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, which amends certain aspects of the accounting for and disclosure of software costs under ASC 350-40. The amendments also supersede the guidance on web site development costs in ASC 350-50. The guidance in this update will be effective for all entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027 and interim reporting periods within those reporting periods. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of adopting this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements, which is intended to improve the navigability of the guidance in ASC 270 and clarify when it applies. The guidance is effective for interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the potential impact, if any, of adopting this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 10, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 28, 2025
2023Mar 11, 2024
2022Mar 16, 2023
2021Mar 1, 2022
2020Mar 26, 2021

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.