10.
Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
The Company’s leases primarily include corporate offices and warehouse space. The lease terms of operating leases vary from one year to nine years, with expirations through May 2034. The Company has leases that include one or more options to extend the lease term for up to five years as well as options to terminate the lease within one year. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the Company will exercise such options. Most of these options to extend or terminate the lease do not create a significant economic incentive and hence are not recognized as part of the Company’s operating lease liabilities and operating lease right-of-use assets. The Company did not modify, enter into, or acquire any material leasing arrangements during the year ended December 31, 2024. In June 2025, the Company amended the lease agreement for its corporate headquarters to terminate certain suites and extend the terms of other suites to 2034. The impact from terminating certain suites was immaterial.
The components of lease costs were as follows:

Year Ended December 31,
2023
2024
2025
(in millions)
Operating lease costs
$
16 
$
13 
$
Short-term lease costs
— 
— 
Variable lease costs
Total lease costs
$
19 
$
17 
$
12 

The weighted-average lease term and discount rate were as follows:

Year Ended December 31,
2023
2024
2025
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years)
2.8
1.9
7.4
Weighted-average discount rate
4.19 
%
4.16 
%
3.99 
%

As of December 31, 2025, the future maturities of lease liabilities were as follows:

Amount
Year ending December 31,
(in millions)
2026
$
2027
2028
2029
2030
Thereafter
17 
Total undiscounted lease payments
42 
Less: imputed interest
(7)
Present value of operating lease liabilities
36 
Less: operating lease liabilities, current
(3)
Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent
$
33 

Sales and Indirect Taxes

The Company pays applicable state, franchise, and other taxes in state and local jurisdictions in which the Company conducts business. In the United States, the Company is under audit by various tax authorities with regard to sales and indirect tax matters. The subject matter of these audits primarily relates to the reporting of sales on behalf of the Company’s third-party sellers or tax treatment applied to the sale of the Company’s services in these jurisdictions. The Company believes it properly accrues and pays taxes according to its understanding of the tax requirements in each taxing jurisdiction; however it is possible that tax authorities may question the Company’s interpretation of taxability. As such, there is a high degree of complexity involved in the interpretation and application of state and local sales and indirect tax rules to the Company’s activities. As a result, the Company maintains a reserve related to potential tax, interest, or penalties that may become due. Significant judgments are made by the Company in estimating these reserves which includes assessing the taxability of goods or services transacted using the Company’s technology platform. The Company maintains such reserves until the respective statute of limitations has passed or upon conclusion of an audit examination with the relevant tax authorities, at which point the tax exposure and related interest and penalties are released. The reserve balance was $16 million and $13 million as of December 31, 2024 and 2025, respectively, and was included within other long-term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company recognized a reserve release, net of audit payments, of $35 million, $14 million, and $3 million related to these reserves for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2024, and 2025, respectively. These amounts were recorded within general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
Legal Matters
Independent Contractor Classification Matters
The Company operates in several jurisdictions where there have been regulations enacted with respect to methods companies should use to classify workers as either independent contractors or employees, such as California, which enacted California Assembly Bill 5 in 2019. The Company believes that it has properly classified its workers in all jurisdictions in which it operates.

Further, on December 16, 2020, the California state ballot initiative, Proposition 22, which provides a framework that offers legal certainty regarding the status of independent workers offering delivery services in California and protects worker flexibility, the quality of on-demand work, and access to benefits for those who qualify, among other things, became effective. The Company provides appropriate worker benefits and other protections in accordance with Proposition 22, including guaranteed minimum earnings, healthcare subsidies, insurance, and safety trainings. Although the constitutionality of Proposition 22 was subsequently challenged, on July 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 22 as constitutional. However, there may continue to be legal challenges, or legislative or other attempts to amend or otherwise invalidate the benefits, protections, or the independent worker status provided by Proposition 22. Further, any future judgments, settlements, or orders issued by a court or governmental body or otherwise in connection with any judicial, administrative, or legal proceeding that results in the Company being prohibited from continuing to engage with independent-contractor shoppers in the manner it currently does would likely result in increases to its costs related to shoppers and decreases in the breadth of its offerings and geographic coverage. Further, if the Company changes its offerings or increases customer fees as a result of the increased costs, such changes may result in lower order volumes, which in turn would have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The Company has other active legal matters in California and several other jurisdictions, including litigation, government audits, administrative claims, and inquiries, related to its classification of individuals who provide delivery and other fulfillment services as non-employee contractors. These matters involve allegations that certain individuals are misclassified and, as a result, may be due unpaid minimum statutory wages, overtime, expense reimbursement, and certain other payments and protections, among other issues. Courts and agencies handling these matters may rule that the Company cannot engage workers to perform certain tasks, including delivery and other fulfillment services, as independent contractors. In some of these cases, the Company has entered into settlement agreements to resolve the claims without any admission of liability and in others, there is active litigation or proceedings.

The Company has also been, is currently, and may in the future be involved in administrative audits with various state and local enforcement agencies, including audits related to shopper classification, state and local ordinance requirements, and unemployment insurance and workers’ compensation contributions. The Company is currently involved in such audits in several states. The Company believes that it complies with applicable legal requirements and that shoppers are properly classified as independent contractors; therefore, the Company disputes that it is obligated to provide such additional benefits under state law and plans to vigorously contest any adverse assessment or determination. The Company’s chances of success on the merits are still uncertain; however, the Company records a liability within accrued and other current liabilities when it believes that it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be estimated. The results of these audits, assessments, or any negotiated agreements with these agencies, may result in additional payments, including settlement payments, penalties, and interest, and such additional amounts could have a material impact on the Company’s business, financial conditions, results of operations, and cash flows.

The Company is also currently involved in several putative class and collective actions, thousands of alleged individual claims, including those brought or threatened to be brought in arbitration or compelled to arbitrate pursuant to its independent contractor agreements, and matters brought, in whole or in part, as representative actions under California’s Private Attorney General Act, Labor Code Section 2698, et seq., alleging that the Company misclassified shoppers as independent contractors and related claims. None of the putative class or collective actions have progressed to or resulted in class certification. Those involving misclassification have either been compelled to individual arbitration or have motions to compel individual arbitration which have been granted and are now pending appeal.

Securities Litigation

On January 25, 2024, a purported stockholder filed suit against the Company and certain of the Company’s current and former officers and directors in the Northern District of California, on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of the
Company’s common stock in its IPO or between September 19, 2023 and October 1, 2023. The complaint alleges violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended in connection with the Company’s IPO, and seeks damages and attorneys’ fees, among other things. An amended complaint also added the underwriters of the Company’s IPO as defendants. On October 29, 2024, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which the court granted on May 9, 2025 with leave to amend. On May 30, 2025, plaintiffs agreed to dismiss the case with prejudice, without receiving any compensation.

FTC Investigation

In July 2025, staff of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) asserted they had authority to enter into consent negotiations with the Company relating to certain of its marketing and Instacart+ membership program practices. Following extensive discussions with staff of the FTC, the Company agreed to enter into a consent order to conclude the FTC’s investigation, which became final on January 13, 2026. The consent order does not include any admission of liability. Pursuant to the consent order, the Company is required to pay $60 million to the FTC, which was included in accrued and other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2025, and subsequently paid in January 2026.

Other Litigation Matters

Besides the matters described above, the Company and its subsidiaries are regularly subject to claims, lawsuits, arbitration proceedings, administrative actions, government investigations, and other legal and regulatory proceedings involving unpaid wages, missed breaks, premium or overtime pay, hazard pay, inadequate notice under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act or its state equivalent, retaliation, denial of or interference with leave of absence, improper application of our paid time off or other policies, discrimination or harassment based on a protected characteristic, wrongful termination, failure to accommodate a disability, unfair labor practices, personal injury, intellectual property, including patent infringement, property damage, securities and stockholder claims, commercial and contract disputes, unfair competition, marketing claims, consumer protection claims, including auto-renewal practices, pricing, and fees, data protection and privacy, environmental claims, health and safety, appropriate disclosures of worker and customer rights and entitlements, weights and measures, compliance with regulatory requirements, and other matters. In some of these proceedings, claims for substantial monetary damages are asserted against the Company and could result in fines, penalties, compensatory damages, or non-monetary relief. The Company does not believe that these matters will have a material adverse effect upon its operations, cash flows, or financial condition.

To the extent the Company has agreed to settle outstanding claims or where the Company has concluded it is probable that a resolution may be reached at an amount of loss that is estimable, the loss has been recognized within general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations. During periods where the settled amount is less than the loss reserved or if the Company estimates that an outstanding claim is less than that previously recorded, the Company will recognize a reserve release related to the claims within general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations. During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company recognized a reserve release related to these claims of $5 million. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2025, the Company recognized a loss related to these claims of $7 million and $106 million, respectively. The actual losses incurred on claims that have not been resolved may differ from the initial estimates of loss, and such differences could be material.

The Company is also subject from time to time to audits by government agencies in the various jurisdictions in which it operates. To the extent the Company is obligated to make payments in these jurisdictions (other than income taxes), the Company has recorded the related expense within general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations. The results of these audits may result in additional payments, penalties, and interest, and such additional amounts could be material.

Indemnifications

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with certain of the Company’s officers, directors, and current and former employees, and the Company’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain certain indemnification obligations. It is not possible to determine the maximum potential loss under these indemnification provisions due to the limited history of prior indemnification claims and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular
provision. To date, no significant costs have been incurred, either individually or collectively, in connection with the Company’s indemnification provisions.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 28, 2025
2023Mar 5, 2024

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.