Note 5 — Fair Value Measurements

We value our financial assets and liabilities at fair value, defined as the price that would be received for assets when sold or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). We utilize market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable.

We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to utilize the best information reasonably available. Accordingly, we use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible and consider the security issuers’ and the third-party issuers’ credit risk in our assessment of fair value.

We classify fair value based on the observability of those inputs using a hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement):

Level 1 — Observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 — Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or through corroboration with observable market data; and

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs, for which there is little or no market data for the assets or liabilities, such as internally-developed valuation models.

Fair Value of Financial Assets:

The following tables set forth the fair value of our financial assets, which consists of cash equivalents and investments classified as available-for-sale securities, that were measured on a recurring basis (in thousands):

 

 

December 31, 2025

 

 

 

Fair Value Hierarchy Level

 

Amortized
Cost

 

 

Unrealized
Gains

 

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

 

Fair
Value

 

Money market funds

 

Level 1

 

$

89,509

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

89,509

 

U.S. Treasury securities

 

Level 1

 

 

239,097

 

 

 

574

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

239,664

 

U.S. Government agency securities

 

Level 2

 

 

201,788

 

 

 

162

 

 

 

(38

)

 

 

201,912

 

Commercial paper

 

Level 2

 

 

289,447

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

(26

)

 

 

289,517

 

Asset-backed securities

 

Level 2

 

 

7,579

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,586

 

Corporate obligations

 

Level 2

 

 

363,645

 

 

 

457

 

 

 

(53

)

 

 

364,049

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,191,065

 

 

$

1,296

 

 

$

(124

)

 

$

1,192,237

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2024

 

 

 

Fair Value Hierarchy Level

 

Amortized
Cost

 

 

Unrealized
Gains

 

 

Unrealized
Losses

 

 

Fair
Value

 

Money market funds

 

Level 1

 

$

71,515

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

71,515

 

U.S. Treasury securities

 

Level 1

 

 

404,377

 

 

 

1,192

 

 

 

(74

)

 

 

405,495

 

U.S. Government agency securities

 

Level 2

 

 

134,547

 

 

 

339

 

 

 

(23

)

 

 

134,863

 

Commercial paper

 

Level 2

 

 

302,043

 

 

 

399

 

 

 

(128

)

 

 

302,314

 

Asset-backed securities

 

Level 2

 

 

13,924

 

 

 

42

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

13,966

 

Corporate obligations

 

Level 2

 

 

290,616

 

 

 

598

 

 

 

(182

)

 

 

291,032

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,217,022

 

 

$

2,570

 

 

$

(407

)

 

$

1,219,185

 

Investments in corporate debt securities, commercial paper, asset-backed securities and U.S. Government agency securities are classified as Level 2 as they are valued based upon quoted market prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant inputs are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets. Where applicable, these models project future cash flows and discount the future amounts to a present value using market-based observable inputs obtained from various third-party data providers, including but not limited to benchmark yields, interest rate curves, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes and reference data.

No credit losses on debt securities were recognized in the periods presented. In its evaluation to determine expected credit losses, management considered all available historical and current information, expectations of future economic conditions, the type of security, the credit rating of the security, and the size of the loss position, as well as other relevant information. The unrealized losses as of December 31, 2025 are attributed to market interest rate changes and are not attributed to credit. The Company does not intend to sell any of these available-for-sale investments before their effective maturity or market price recovery.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 27, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024
2022Mar 1, 2023
2021Feb 25, 2022
2020Feb 26, 2021
2019Mar 4, 2020
2018Mar 7, 2019
2017Mar 5, 2018
2016Mar 6, 2017
2015Mar 3, 2016

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.