Accounting Pronouncements
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance, ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which focuses on the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. This guidance requires a public entity to disclose, on an annual basis, a tabular rate reconciliation using both percentages and currency amounts, broken out into specified categories with certain reconciling items further broken out by nature and jurisdiction to the extent those items exceed a specified threshold. In addition, all entities are required to disclose income taxes paid, net of refunds received disaggregated by federal, state/local, and foreign and by jurisdiction if the amount is at least 5% of total income tax payments, net of refunds received. The new standard was adopted by the Company effective January 1, 2025 on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this ASU did not have any effect on our consolidated balance sheets or statements of income and comprehensive income. The new disclosures under this ASU are described in more detail in Note 17.

The FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which requires more detailed disclosures about specified categories of expenses (including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, intangible asset amortization, and depreciation) included in certain expense captions presented on the face of the statement of income. ASU 2024-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim reporting periods within fiscal years beginning one year later. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements.

The FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets. This amendment introduces a practical expedient, under which an entity may elect to assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset when developing reasonable and supportable forecasts as part of estimating expected credit losses. ASU 2025-05 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025 and interim reporting periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements.

The FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. This amendment simplifies the software capitalization guidance by removing all references to software development project stages so that the guidance is neutral to different software development methods. ASU 2025-06 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim reporting periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The amendments in this update permit an entity to apply the new guidance using a prospective, retrospective or modified transition approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 6, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 27, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024
2022Mar 15, 2023
2021Mar 7, 2022
2020Mar 15, 2021
2019Mar 11, 2020
2018Mar 22, 2019
2017Mar 15, 2018
2016Apr 19, 2017

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.