FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The fair value framework requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities that the Company can assess at the measurement date.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.
Financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:
As of December 31, 2025As of December 31, 2024
(In millions)TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Assets:
Investments$35.9 $35.9 $— $— $13.2 $13.2 $— $— 
Derivatives3.7 — 3.7 6.8 — 6.8 
Total assets$39.6 $35.9 $3.7 $— $20.0 $13.2 $6.8 $— 
Liabilities:
Derivatives$143.2 $— $143.2 $— $44.4 $— $44.4 $— 
Total liabilities$143.2 $— $143.2 $— $44.4 $— $44.4 $— 

Investments represent securities held in trusts for the non-qualified deferred compensation plan and executive severance plan. Investments are classified as trading securities and are valued based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the Company has the ability to access. As of December 31, 2025, $1.5 million of investments are recorded in other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet related to investments that are expected to be redeemed within the next twelve months. The remaining investments are reported separately in Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Investments include an unrealized gain of $0.1 million and $1.1 million as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

The Company uses the income approach to measure the fair value of derivative instruments on a recurring basis. This approach calculates the present value of the future cash flow by measuring the change between the derivative contract rate and the published market indicative currency rate, multiplied by the contract notional values, and applying an appropriate discount rate as well as a factor of credit risk.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and payables, as well as financial instruments included in other current assets and other current liabilities, approximate fair values because of their short-term maturities.

The carrying values and the estimated fair values of debt financial instruments as of December 31 were as follows:
20252024
(In millions)Carrying ValueEstimated Fair ValueCarrying ValueEstimated Fair Value
2026 Convertible senior notes$401.7 $406.8 $399.4 $398.2 
2030 Convertible senior notes560.3 594.5 — — 
Senior Secured Term Loan B893.2 893.2 — — 
Revolving credit facility, expires January 2, 203037.6 37.6 854.0 854.0 
Other2.0 2.0 — — 

The carrying values of the Company’s revolving credit facility recorded in long-term debt on the Balance Sheet approximate their fair values due to their variable interest rates. The fair value of the Convertible senior notes is estimated using Level 2 inputs as they are not registered securities nor listed on any securities exchange but may be traded by qualified institutional buyers.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 2, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 28, 2025
2023Feb 23, 2024
2022Feb 23, 2023
2021Feb 24, 2022
2020Feb 25, 2021
2019Mar 2, 2020
2018Feb 28, 2019
2017Feb 28, 2018
2016Feb 28, 2017
2015Feb 29, 2016

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.