ORTHOPEDIATRICS CORPKIDS
ORTHOPEDIATRICS CORP Commitments Disclosure
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.
IMED Surgical - Software Ownership Dispute
On October 16, 2020, the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Orthex, LLC (“Orthex”), the Company’s largest investor, Squadron, and certain other defendants, were named in a lawsuit filed by IMED Surgical, LLC, a New
Jersey company ("IMED"), in Broward County, Florida Circuit Court. In the lawsuit, IMED claims, among other things, that it is the rightful owner of certain patented point-and-click planning software being used by the Company, Orthex and Squadron (specifically, U.S. Patent No. 10,258,377 (titled “Point and click alignment method for orthopedic surgeons, and surgical and clinical accessories and devices,” issued on April 16, 2019) (hereinafter, the “’377 Patent”).
In June 2019, the Company purchased all the issued and outstanding units of membership interests in Orthex, and all the issued and outstanding shares of stock of Vilex in Tennessee, Inc. for $60,000 in total consideration. Vilex and Orthex are primarily manufacturers of foot and ankle surgical implants, including cannulated screws, fusion devices, surgical staples and bone plates, as well as the Orthex Hexapod technology, a system of rings, struts, implants, hardware accessories, and the Point & Click Software used to treat congenital deformities and limb length discrepancies. On December 31, 2019, the Company divested substantially all of the assets relating to Vilex's adult product offerings to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Squadron, in exchange for a $25,000 reduction in a term note owed to Squadron in connection with the initial acquisition. As part of the sale, the Company also executed an exclusive license arrangement with Squadron providing for perpetual access to certain intellectual property, including the ‘377 Patent. According to the lawsuit, the other defendants, who are unrelated to the Company, assigned the ‘377 Patent to Orthex in violation of certain agreements with IMED. IMED, among other things, requests that the defendants be ordered to convey and assign to IMED all of their rights, title and interests in and to the ’377 Patent and seeks certain compensatory, consequential and unjust enrichment damages from Orthex and the unrelated defendants.
On May 13, 2021, the Court ordered the lawsuit stayed pending arbitration. To the extent IMED desires to further pursue the matter, it must first do so through a separate arbitration proceeding. In mid-November 2021, IMED initiated an arbitration proceeding; however, IMED failed to pay the fees it was required to pay for the arbitration to continue, resulting in the arbitration panel terminating the arbitration proceedings in mid-October 2022. In connection with the stay order, the Court also ordered the Company, Orthex and Squadron to give notice to IMED before any attempt to dispose, assign, sell or otherwise encumber the ‘377 Patent. The Company, Orthex and Squadron filed an appeal of this component of the order, but the appellate court affirmed the lower court’s decision. The Company, Orthex and Squadron have not sought to further pursue an appeal of the subject order.
On February 3, 2023, the Court partially lifted the stay in this case for the sole purpose of, as clarified by the Court's order on March 7, 2023, "permitting any party to argue any motion challenging the events that occurred which led to the arbitration panel's termination order." No filing was made in response to that order. No further filings were made in this case until October 30, 2023, when defendants filed a motion to dismiss.
On December 12, 2023, the Court ordered IMED has until March 13, 2024, to appear before the Court and show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to pursue arbitration consistent with the Court’s orders. On March 13, 2024, a hearing took place to discuss the status of IMED’s effort to re-initiate arbitration. Thereafter, on March 25, 2024, the Court ordered, if, by April 27, 2024, IMED has not begun arbitration, resolved this case, or substantiated (in the form of an attorney and client declaration) that it has executed an agreement with a litigation funder to pay for arbitration proceedings, to pay the balance due to the subject arbitration association and to re-instate the arbitration, the Court will dismiss this case without prejudice. On April 26, 2024, IMED informed the Court it has executed an agreement with a litigation funder to pay for arbitration proceedings, to pay the balance due to the subject arbitration association, and to reinstate the arbitration, and is in the final stages of resolving the balance due to the subject arbitration association.
On September 20, 2024, the Court dismissed IMED’s lawsuit, without prejudice, for failure to prosecute. However, contemporaneously, IMED re-initiated arbitration.
Although we believe the Company has strong defenses to the IMED arbitration and we intend to vigorously defend the claims asserted against us, arbitration can involve complex factual and legal questions, and an adverse resolution of such proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We are not presently a party to any other legal proceedings the outcome of which, if determined adversely to us, would individually or in the aggregate materially affect our financial position or results of operations or cash flows.
Purchase Obligations and Performance Requirements
As a result of entering into a license agreement for the exclusive distribution of the 7D Surgical FLASHTM Navigation platform during 2021, the Company agreed to a minimum purchase commitment for the first twelve months of that agreement. As of December 31, 2021 the remaining balance of the commitment was $1,900. For all subsequent years, the Company met the minimum purchase commitment. Additionally, the contract requires future purchase commitments based upon a percentage of historical purchases. As a result and as of December 31, 2025, the Company has a minimum purchase commitment for approximately $1,092 for the year ending December 31, 2026.
On July 20, 2021, we entered into an amended license agreement, resulting in a five-year extension of our exclusive distribution rights of the FIREFLY Technology. As a component of the agreement the Company is required to meet minimum performance metrics, measured by the number of spine procedures in the fiscal year which used the FIREFLY products against the annual requirement in the agreement. This includes any scheduled surgeries whereby the Company has committed to payment of the product. The number of required surgeries varies each year of the agreement. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company did not reach the minimum performance metrics. As such, the Company recorded $1,760 and $2,000 as a component of cost of revenue for the shortfall which occurred during 2024 and 2023, respectively. On May 15, 2025, the Company issued 55,143 unregistered shares of the Company's common stock to Mighty Oak to satisfy the obligation that existed for past unmet minimum performance metrics related to 2024. In 2025, the agreement was amended and extended through 2030. The amended agreement modified the minimum performance metrics to be based on a purchase requirement of $3,500 annually through 2030 instead of the number of spine procedures. The amended threshold of units purchased was met in 2025, so there was no shortfall recorded during 2025.
Royalties
As of December 31, 2025, we are contracted to pay royalties to individuals and entities that provide research and development services, which range from 0.5% to 20% of sales. Currently, we have no minimum royalty commitments.
We have products in development that have royalty commitments. In any development project, there are significant variables that will affect the amount and timing of these payments and as of December 31, 2025, we have not been able to determine the amount and timing of payments. We do not anticipate these future payments will have a material impact on our financial results.Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 4, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 5, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 8, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 1, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 3, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 11, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 5, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 7, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 15, 2018 | |
About Commitments Disclosures
Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.
Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.