KIMCO REALTY CORP New Standards Disclosure
New Accounting Pronouncements
The following table represents Accounting Standards Updates ("ASUs") to the FASB’s ASCs that, as of December 31, 2025, are not yet effective for the Company and for which the Company has not elected early adoption, where permitted:
ASU |
Description |
Effective Date |
Effect on the financial statements or other significant matters |
ASU 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses ASU 2025-01, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive, Income -Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), Clarifying the Effective Date
|
These ASUs require additional disclosure about a public business entity’s expenses and more detailed information about the types of expenses in commonly presented expense captions. Such information should allow investors to better understand an entity's performance, assess future cash flows, and compare performance over time and with other entities. The amendments will require public business entities to disclose in the notes to the financial statements, at each interim and annual reporting period, specific information about certain costs and expenses, employee compensation, depreciation, and intangible asset amortization included in each expense caption presented on the face of the income statement, and the total amount of an entity's operating expenses. |
Fiscal years beginning January 1, 2027, and interim periods for fiscal years beginning January 1, 2028; Early adoption permitted
|
The Company is reviewing the extent of new disclosures necessary prior to implementation. Other than additional disclosure, the adoption of these ASUs will not have a material impact on the Company's financial position and/or results of operations. |
ASU 2025-03 Business Combinations (Topic 805) and Consolidation (Topic 810): Determining the Accounting Acquirer in the Acquisition of a Variable Interest Entity
|
The amendments in this ASU revise the guidance for determining the accounting acquirer in the acquisition of a VIE. An entity will be required to consider the factors in ASC 805-10-55-12 through 805-10-55-15 in determining which entity is the accounting acquirer when a VIE is acquired in a business combination effected primarily by exchanging equity interests. Previously, the primary beneficiary was always identified as the accounting acquirer in such transactions. The amendments are required to be applied prospectively to any acquisition transaction that occurs after the initial application date.
|
January 1, 2027; early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting
|
The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASU, which is to be applied prospectively, to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and/or results of operations.
|
ASU 2025-05 Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets
|
The amendments in this ASU provide a practical
|
January 1, 2026; early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period
|
The adoption of this ASU, which is to be applied prospectively, will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and/or results of operations.
|
ASU 2025-06, |
This ASU amends the existing standard to remove all
|
January 1, 2028; |
The Company is |
ASU |
Description |
Effective Date |
Effect on the financial statements or other significant matters |
ASU 2025-07, |
The new guidance will reduce the number of
|
January 1, 2027; |
The Company is |
ASU 2025-08, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Purchased Loans |
The new guidance makes significant changes to the accounting for certain acquired seasoned loans subject to CECL. The FASB decided not to change the existing models for originated assets, purchased credit deteriorated assets ("PCD") or other acquired assets. Under this ASU, the initial allowance for credit losses recorded upon the acquisition of loans in scope is recognized as an adjustment to the amortized cost basis of the loan–similar to the PCD model. For these loans, the “day-one” credit loss estimate does not impact earnings immediately but rather is amortized over time as an adjustment to interest income. Subsequent changes in the allowance for credit losses are reported in earnings within credit loss expense. The amendments should be applied prospectively to loans that are acquired on or after the initial application date. |
January 1, 2027; early adoption is permitted |
The Company is
|
ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements |
This ASU clarifies certain aspects of the guidance on The five main provisions include: 1. Similar risk assessment for cash flow hedges 2. Hedging interest payments on choose-your-rate debt 3. Cash flow hedges of non-financial forecasted transactions 4. Net written options as hedging instruments 5. Foreign currency-denominated debt designated as a hedging instrument and a hedged item The amendments should be applied prospectively, and there are transition provisions designed to assist in migrating existing hedging relationships to the new guidance. |
January 1, 2027; early adoption is permitted on any date on or after the
|
The Company is |
ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): - Narrow-Scope Improvements |
This ASU clarifies interim disclosure requirements, including providing a comprehensive list of interim disclosure requirements under U.S. GAAP and a disclosure principle that |
January 1, 2028; early adoption is permitted |
The Company is |
ASU |
Description |
Effective Date |
Effect on the financial statements or other significant matters |
|
requires entities to disclose events since the last annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. The amendments can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements.
|
|
prospectively, will have on the Company’s financial
|
The following ASUs to the FASB’s ASCs have been adopted by the Company as of the date listed:
ASU |
Description |
Adoption Date |
Effect on the financial statements or other significant matters |
ASU 2023-05, Business Combinations – Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60): Recognition and Initial Measurement
|
The amendments in this ASU address the accounting for contributions made to a joint venture, upon formation, in a joint venture’s separate financial statements. To reduce diversity in practice and provide decision-useful information to a joint venture’s investors, these amendments require that a joint venture apply a new basis of accounting upon formation. By applying a new basis of accounting, a joint venture, upon formation, will recognize and initially measure its assets and liabilities at fair value (with exceptions to fair value measurement that are consistent with the business combinations guidance). Additionally, existing joint ventures have the option to apply the guidance retrospectively.
|
January 1, 2025
|
This ASU does not impact accounting for joint ventures by the venturers. As such, the adoption of this ASU did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position and/or results of operations.
|
ASU 2024-01, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope Application of Profits Interest and Similar Awards
|
The amendments in this ASU clarify how to determine whether profits interest and similar awards should be accounted for as share-based payment arrangements (ASC 718) or as cash bonus or profit-sharing arrangements (ASC 710, Compensation - General, or other guidance) and apply to all reporting entities that account for profits interest awards as compensation to employees or non-employees. In addition to the illustrative guidance, this ASU modifies the language in paragraph 718-10-15-3 to improve its clarity and operability without changing the guidance. The amendments should be applied either retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements, or prospectively to profits interests and similar awards granted or modified on or after the adoption date. |
January 1, 2025
|
The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and/or results of operations.
|
ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures
|
This ASU requires entities to provide additional information in the rate reconciliation and additional disclosures about income taxes paid. The guidance requires public business entities to disclose in their rate reconciliation table additional categories of information about federal, state and foreign income taxes and to provide more details about the reconciling items in some categories if the items meet a quantitative threshold. The guidance requires all entities to disclose annually income taxes paid (net of refunds received) disaggregated by federal (national), state and foreign taxes and to disaggregate the information by jurisdiction based on a quantitative threshold.
|
Fiscal year beginning January 1, 2025 |
The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position and/or results of operations.
|
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.