In November 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-07 “Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures,” or ASU 2023-07. The amendments in ASU 2023-07 aim to improve reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. ASU 2023-07 was adopted by the Company and is effective for the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, and subsequent interim periods. The adoption of ASU 2023-07 expanded certain disclosures but did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2023-09 “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures,” or ASU 2023-09. The amendments in ASU 2023-09 aim to enhance the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures. ASU 2023-09 was adopted by the Company and is effective for the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025. The retrospective adoption of ASU 2023-09 expanded our disclosures but did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2024, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2024-03 “Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40)” or ASU 2024-03. The amendments in ASU 2024-03 require additional disclosure of the nature of expenses included in the income statement as well as disclosures about specific types of expenses included in the expense captions presented in the income statement. ASU 2024-03 is effective for the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2027 and interim period reporting beginning in fiscal 2028 on a
prospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2025, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2025-05 “Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326)” or ASU 2025-05. The amendments in ASU 2025-05 permit entities to elect a practical expedient when estimating expected credit losses on accounts receivable and contract assets. Under this election, entities may assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of accounts receivable and contract assets when developing forecasts as part of estimating expected credit losses. ASU 2025-05 is effective for the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2026 and interim period reporting beginning in 2026 on a prospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2025-06 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40)” or ASU 2025-06. The amendments in ASU 2025-06 remove references to prescriptive and sequential software development stages. The amendments also require entities to begin capitalizing software costs when management has authorized and committed to funding the software project and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used as intended. ASU 2025-06 is effective for the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2028 and interim period reporting beginning in 2028, with early adoption permitted as of the beginning of a fiscal year. The amendments can be applied prospectively, retrospectively, or on a modified prospective transition method. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2025, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2025-09 “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)” or ASU 2025-09. The amendments in ASU 2025-09 clarify aspects of the guidance on hedge accounting and address incremental hedge accounting issues arising from the global reference rate reform initiative. ASU 2025-09 is effective for the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and interim periods for the year ended December 31, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The amendments must be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2025, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2025-11 “Interim Reporting (Topic 270)” or ASU 2025-11. The amendments in ASU 2025-11 improve guidance in Topic 270 and clarify disclosure requirements for interim reporting periods without changing the fundamental nature of interim reporting. ASU 2025-11 is effective for the Company’s interim reporting periods for the year ended December 31, 2028, with early adoption permitted. The amendments can be applied prospectively or retrospectively to any or all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 6, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 7, 2025
2023Feb 9, 2024
2022Feb 10, 2023
2021Feb 11, 2022
2020Feb 12, 2021
2019Feb 18, 2020
2018Feb 22, 2019
2017Feb 26, 2018
2016Feb 24, 2017
2015Feb 26, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.