Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In November 2024, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures, which requires that public entities disclose, on an annual and interim basis, disaggregated information about specific expense categories (including employee compensation, depreciation, and amortization) presented on the face of the income statement. The guidance will first be effective in annual disclosures for the year ending December 31, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. We are in the process of assessing the impact of ASU 2024-03 on our disclosures.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-04, Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options, which clarifies the requirements for determining whether certain settlements of convertible debt instruments should be accounted for as an induced conversion. The new guidance will first be effective beginning with our first quarter of 2026 and can be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect ASU 2024-04 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-03, Business Combinations (ASC Topic 805) and Consolidation (ASC Topic 810): Determining the Accounting Acquirer in the Acquisition of a Variable Interest Entity, which updates the guidance for determining the accounting acquirer in certain equity-based acquisitions of variable interest entities (“VIEs”). The guidance removes the presumption that the primary beneficiary is always the acquirer and instead requires the general guidance for identifying the acquirer under ASC Topic 805 to be applied. The guidance will first be effective beginning with our first quarter of 2027 and may be applied prospectively or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect ASU 2025-03 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
In May 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-04, Compensation—Stock Compensation (ASC Topic 718) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC Topic 606), which clarifies the accounting for share-based payments granted to customers, including classification of performance conditions, treatment of forfeitures, and application of the variable consideration constraint. The guidance will first be effective beginning with our first quarter of 2027 and may be applied prospectively or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We have not granted any share-based payments to customers. As such, we do not expect ASU 2025-04 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which introduces a practical expedient related to estimating expected credit losses. The practical expedient allows entities to assume that conditions that exist when expected credit losses are estimated do not change for the remaining life of the asset. The guidance will first be effective beginning with our first quarter of 2026 and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect ASU 2025-05 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, which aims to modernize the accounting for software costs that are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 350-40, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software. The updated guidance removes references to project stages and instead requires software costs to be capitalized when both of the following occur: 1) management has authorized and committed to funding the software project, and 2) it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended (referred to as the “probable-to-complete recognition threshold”). The guidance will first be effective in our interim disclosures beginning with the first quarter of 2028 and may be applied prospectively, retrospectively, or using a modified approach. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period. We are in the process of assessing the impact of ASU 2025-06 on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Hedge Accounting Improvements, which introduces targeted refinements to hedge accounting guidance under ASC Topic 815 to better align financial reporting with the economics of risk management activities. The guidance will first be effective in our first quarter of 2027 and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect ASU 2025-09 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements or related disclosures.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements, which aims to clarify and improve the navigability of interim reporting guidance under ASC Topic 270 without changing the fundamental nature or extent of interim disclosure requirements. The guidance will first be effective in our first quarter of 2028 and can be applied prospectively or retrospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We are in the process of assessing the impact of ASU 2025-11 on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-12, Codification Improvements, to make technical corrections, clarifications, and minor improvements across multiple areas of U.S. GAAP. The guidance will first be effective in our first quarter of 2027 and prospective or retrospective application will depend on the specific item being addressed. Early adoption is permitted. We are in the process of assessing the impact of ASU 2025-12 on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Accounting Standards Recently Adopted
On January 1, 2024, we adopted ASU No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting--Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures, which requires incremental disclosures about a public entity’s reportable segments but does not change the definition of a segment or the guidance for determining reportable segments. The new guidance requires disclosure of significant segment expenses that are (1) regularly provided to (or easily computed from information regularly provided to) the chief operating decision maker and (2) included in the reported measure of segment profit or loss. The new standard also allows companies to disclose multiple measures of segment profit or loss if those measures are used to assess performance and allocate resources. We adopted ASU 2023-07 using a retrospective method. See Note 2, Segment Information, for more details.
On January 1, 2025, we adopted ASU 2023-09, Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, which requires disaggregated information about our effective tax rate reconciliation as well as information on income taxes paid. We adopted ASU 2023-09 using a prospective method. See Note 12, Income Taxes, for more detail.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 20, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 25, 2025
2023Mar 15, 2024
2022Mar 16, 2023
2021Mar 16, 2022
2020Mar 31, 2021
2019Mar 20, 2020

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.