Rani Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. New Standards Disclosure
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”). ASU 2023-09 requires enhanced annual disclosures regarding the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid information. ASU 2023-09 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025 for entities that qualify as emerging growth companies and may be adopted on a prospective or retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. The Company early adopted this accounting standard in the fourth quarter of 2025 and applied the guidance on a prospective basis. Adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11, Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements. The amendments clarify the scope of interim reporting guidance in U.S. GAAP, consolidate interim disclosure requirements from other Codification topics, and introduce a disclosure principle requiring entities to describe events occurring after the end of the most recent annual period that have a material effect on the entity. The ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027 and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2028. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of this update; however, because the amendments primarily clarify existing interim reporting requirements and do not significantly expand disclosure obligations, the Company does not expect the ASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025‑05, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which amends the guidance for estimating expected credit losses for financial assets within the scope of ASC 326. The amendments allow all entities to elect a practical expedient to assume that the current conditions as of the balance sheet date will remain unchanged for the remaining life of the asset when developing a reasonable and supportable forecast as part of estimating expected credit losses on these assets. Entities are required to disclose their practical expedient and accounting policy elections. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the guidance and does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), to provide disaggregated information about certain income statement costs and expenses. The guidance is effective for the Company’s annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 26, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 31, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 20, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 22, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 31, 2022 | |
About New Standards Disclosures
New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.
Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.