Adoption of New Accounting Standard
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326).” In developing forecasts as part of estimating expected credit losses, the ASU allows entities to elect a practical expedient that assumes that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the asset. We early adopted this standard in the fourth quarter of 2025, and it did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2023-09, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures.” The ASU modifies income tax disclosures by requiring (i) consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliations and (ii) the disclosure of income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction, among other requirements. We adopted this standard on a
retrospective basis for the 2025 annual period. The impact is limited to financial statement disclosures. See Note 15 —Income Taxes.
Accounting Pronouncements Issued but Not Yet Effective
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-10, “Government Grants (Topic 832) – Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities.” This ASU provides recognition, measurement and presentation guidance for government grants received by business entities and is effective for annual and interim periods beginning in 2029. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40).” The ASU updates the guidance on accounting for internal-use software costs by (i) removing all references to software development stages, and (ii) requiring that an entity capitalize software costs when both management has authorized and committed to funding the software project, and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. This ASU is effective for annual and interim periods beginning in 2028. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new standard.
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, “Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income – Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40).” The ASU requires new tabular disclosures disaggregating prescribed expense categories within relevant income statement captions. In addition, the ASU requires disclosure of the total amount of selling expenses and, in annual periods, an entity’s definition of selling expenses, among other disclosure requirements. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning in 2027, and for interim periods beginning January 1, 2028. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new standard, which is limited to financial statement disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 5, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 7, 2025
2023Feb 8, 2024
2022Feb 13, 2023
2021Feb 16, 2022
2020Feb 12, 2021
2019Feb 10, 2020
2018Feb 14, 2019
2017Feb 12, 2018
2016Feb 28, 2017
2015Feb 29, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.