Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In December 2023, FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Tax Disclosures. This ASU expands disclosures in an entity’s income tax rate reconciliation table and regarding cash taxes paid. The Company adopted this guidance on a prospective basis effective January 1, 2025 and included the required disclosures in the Company’s notes to the financial statements for our income taxes. This standard update did not affect the Company’s operating results.
In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-12, Codification Improvements ("ASU 2025-12"). This ASU addresses suggestions received from stakeholders regarding the Accounting Standards Codification and makes other incremental improvements to U.S. GAAP. The update represents changes to the Codification that clarify, correct errors in or make other improvements to a variety of topics that are intended to make it easier to understand and apply. Early adoption is allowed on an issue-by-issue basis. The Company elected to early adopt Issue 10 on a prospective basis as of January 1, 2025. Issue 10 relates to stock repurchases, and explicitly permits the excess of repurchase price over par or stated value to be accounted for entirely as a deduction from additional paid-in capital as long as additional paid-in capital does not become negative. As a result, the Company recorded a $77.5 million deduction from additional paid-in capital during the year ended December 31, 2025. The Company is still evaluating the remaining issues but does not expect a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Topic 220): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, which requires disclosure of additional information about specific expense categories underlying certain income statement expense line items. Additionally, in January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01 to clarify the effective date of ASU 2024-03. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and requires either prospective or retrospective application. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the ASU on its disclosures.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which provides for a practical expedient to estimate credit losses related to accounts receivable and contract assets from revenue contracts accounted for in accordance with ASC 606 using information as of the balance sheet date. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its financial statements and related disclosures.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. This ASU makes targeted improvements to the accounting for internal-use software costs, removing the previous “development stage” model and introducing a more judgment-based approach. This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027 and provides for adoption on a prospective basis, with retrospective or modified retrospective application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on its financial statements and related disclosures.

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.