Accounting Standards Adopted in the Current Fiscal Year
In December 2025, the Company adopted ASU No. 2023-09, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (ASU 2023-09)." The standard requires a reconciliation of a company’s effective tax rate in both dollar amount and percentage as well as information on income taxes paid. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 on a prospective basis. Accordingly, prior period disclosures have not been adjusted to reflect the new disclosure requirements. Refer to Note 15 - Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details.
Newly Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, "Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses," which requires public business entities to provide disaggregated disclosures of certain expense categories that are included in expense line items on the Statement of Comprehensive Income. The guidance is effective for the Company for annual periods beginning in 2027 and interim periods beginning in 2028. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on our disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 25, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 5, 2025
2023Feb 28, 2024
2022Mar 1, 2023
2021Mar 2, 2022
2020Mar 2, 2021
2019Feb 24, 2020
2018Feb 21, 2019
2017Feb 20, 2018
2016Mar 1, 2017
2015Feb 24, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.