Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

ASU 2023-06

In October 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2023-06, Disclosure Improvements: Codification Amendments in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative, which incorporates certain SEC disclosure requirements into the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). The amendments in the ASU are expected to clarify or improve disclosure and presentation requirements of a variety of ASC topics, allow investors to more easily compare entities subject to the SEC’s existing disclosures with those entities that were not previously subject to the requirements, and align the requirements in the ASC with the SEC’s regulations. The effective date for each amendment will be the date on which the SEC’s removal of that related disclosure from Regulation or Regulation becomes effective, with early adoption prohibited. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect ASU will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2024-03

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, requiring public entities to disclose additional information about specific expense categories in the notes to the financial statements on an interim and annual basis. In January 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-01, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures, which amends the effective date of ASU 2024-03 to clarify that all public business entities are required to adopt the guidance in annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption of ASU 2024-03 is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the ASU.

ASU 2025-05

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets, which provides entities with a practical expedient to simplify the estimation of expected credit losses on current accounts receivable and

current contract assets that arise from transactions accounted for under ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers by allowing the assumption that current conditions as of the balance sheet date will not change during the remaining life of the asset. ASU 2025-05 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025 and interim periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect that ASU 2025-05 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2025-06

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software, to improve the operability and application of guidance related to capitalized software development costs. ASU 2025-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. The guidance may be applied prospectively, retrospectively, or using a modified retrospective basis that is based on the status of the project and whether software costs were capitalized before the date of adoption. The Company intends to early adopt ASU 2025-06 prospectively, effective January 1, 2026. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2025-11

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11 Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow-Scope Improvements. ASU 2025-11 clarifies the applicability of ASC 270, Interim Reporting and the form and content of interim financial statements. In addition, ASU 2025-11 requires entities to disclose material events occurring since the last annual reporting period. ASU 2025-11 will be effective for interim periods beginning January 1, 2028, and can be applied on a prospective or retrospective basis. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements; however, the Company does not expect that it will affect its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

ASU 2023-09

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, to enhance the transparency and decision-usefulness of income tax disclosures, particularly in the rate reconciliation table and disclosures about income taxes paid. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09 prospectively for the year ended December 31, 2025.

ASU 2025-10

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-10, Government Grants (Topic 832), to improve U.S. GAAP by establishing authoritative guidance on the accounting for government grants received by business entities. ASU 2025-10 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2029, and interim reporting periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted the new guidance on December 31, 2025 with no material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.