New Accounting Standards:

 

In December 2023, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update "ASU" 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740) Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures. The amendments in this Update related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid disclosures improve the transparency of income tax disclosures by requiring consistent categories and greater disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid disaggregated by jurisdiction. The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company has provided the amended disclosures herein Footnote 18 - Income Taxes of our Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2025.

 

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280) Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. The amendments in this Update improve reportable segment disclosure requirements, primarily through enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses. The main new provision requires significant segment expenses that are regularly provided to the chief operating decision maker and included within each reported measure of segment profit or loss. The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. This Update was adopted by the Company and amendments were made to Footnote 23 - Segment Information.

 

On March 29, 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-02, Codification ImprovementsAmendments to Remove References to the Concepts Statements. ASU 2024-02 removes various references to the FASB’s Concepts Statements from the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (Codification or GAAP). The Concepts Statements are non-authoritative guidance issued by the FASB that provide the objectives, qualitative characteristics and other concepts that govern the development of accounting principles by the FASB. ASU 2024-02 applies to all reporting entities and updates the Codification by eliminating discrete references to the Concepts Statements across a variety of defined terms and Topics within the Codification. The FASB does not expect these Updates to have a significant effect on current accounting practice. The amendments in ASU 2024-02 are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024. The Company has reviewed our Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2025 to ensure compliance with this Update.

 

In November 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-08, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326). ASU 2025-08 expands the use of the gross up method to certain acquired loans beyond purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The ASU applies the gross-up method to acquired non-PCD assets that are purchased seasoned loans ultimately eliminating the Day 1 credit loss expense and reducing interest income recognized in subsequent periods. The ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026, and is applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. This update was adopted by the Company during the first quarter of 2026.  

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 5, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 6, 2025
2023Mar 7, 2024
2022Mar 9, 2023
2021Mar 9, 2022
2020Mar 4, 2021
2019Mar 5, 2020
2018Mar 5, 2019
2017Mar 6, 2018
2016Mar 7, 2017
2015Mar 10, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.