HARROW, INC. Commitments Disclosure
NOTE 18. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Legal
General and Other
In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings, government investigations and other matters that are complex in nature and have outcomes that are difficult to predict. See also Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors. The Company describes legal proceedings and other matters that are/were significant or that it believes could become significant in this footnote.
The Company records accruals for loss contingencies to the extent that it concludes it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the related loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company evaluates, on a quarterly basis, developments in legal proceedings and other matters that could cause an increase or decrease in the amount of a liability that has been accrued previously.
The Company’s legal proceedings involve various aspects of its business and a variety of claims, some of which present novel factual allegations and/or unique legal theories. Typically, a number of the matters pending against the Company are at early stages of the legal process, which in complex proceedings of the sort the Company face often extend for several years. While it is not possible to accurately predict or determine the eventual outcomes of matters that have not concluded, an adverse determination in one or more of these matters (whether discussed in this footnote or not) currently pending may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows. Legal costs incurred for loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.
Certain recent developments concerning the Company’s legal proceedings it believes are or were material to its business and other matters are discussed below:
Ocular Science, Inc. et. al
In July 2021, ImprimisRx, LLC, a subsidiary of the Company, filed a lawsuit against Ocular Science, Inc. and OSRX, Inc. (together, “OSRX”) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, asserting claims for copyright infringement, trademark infringement, unfair competition and false advertising (Lanham Act). Since July 2021, the complaint had been amended and OSRX added counterclaims alleging ImprimisRx, LLC was violating the Lanham Act with false advertising. The Court granted cross motions for summary judgment on each party’s Lanham Act claims, thus leaving only ImprimisRx, LLC’s copyright infringement, trademark infringement, and unfair competition claims for trial. Following a jury trial in November 2024, a jury found OSRX acted with malice, fraud, or oppression, willfully engaging in trademark infringement and unfair competition under California and federal law, and ImprimisRx, LLC received a $34,900,000 jury verdict award, which included $20,400,000 in punitive damages and $14,500,000 in actual damages. An amended final judgment was entered on October 1, 2025, which reduced the OSRX liability to $11,249,000, plus post-judgment interest, and required OSRX to cease use of certain trademarks. OSRX filed notice of appeal on October 9, 2025. No collection activity is allowed during the appeal. The Company will vigorously pursue its interest during the appeal process however, due to uncertainty regarding the probability of collection, the Company has not recognized any amounts associated with the judgment during the year ended December 31, 2025.
Product and Professional Liability
Product and professional liability litigation represents an inherent risk to all firms in the pharmaceutical and pharmacy industry. The Company utilizes traditional third-party insurance policies with regard to our product and professional liability claims. Such insurance coverage at any given time reflects current market conditions, including cost and availability, when the policy is written.
Indemnities
In addition to the indemnification provisions contained in the Company’s charter documents, the Company generally enters into separate indemnification agreements with each of the Company’s directors and officers. These agreements require the Company, among other things, to indemnify the director or officer against specified expenses and liabilities, such as attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines and settlements, paid by the individual in connection with any action, suit or proceeding arising out of the individual’s status or service as the Company’s director or officer, other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct or conduct that is knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest, and to advance expenses incurred by the individual in connection with any proceeding against the individual with respect to which the individual may be entitled to indemnification by the Company. Several of the Company’s asset purchase and license agreements contain customary representations, warranties, covenants and confidentiality provisions, and also contain mutual indemnification obligations related primarily to performance under the respective agreements. The Company also indemnifies its lessors in connection with its facility leases for certain claims arising from the use of the facilities. These indemnities do not provide for any limitation of the maximum potential future payments the Company could be obligated to make. Historically, the Company has not incurred any payments for these obligations and, therefore, no liabilities have been recorded for these indemnities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Asset Purchase, License and Related Agreements
FDA Approved Product Acquisitions
In recent years, the Company has acquired commercial and product rights to various FDA approved ophthalmic medications and products through asset purchase, licenses, supply and/or other related agreements. In general, in exchange for product and commercial rights these agreements provide the counterparties with certain upfront and contingent milestone payments typically related to certain annual sales amounts and manufacturing events, and in certain cases, per unit transfer prices and royalties on sales of some of the products.
During the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, $9,526,000, $4,126,000 and $647,000, respectively, were incurred under these agreements as royalty expenses. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, $7,000,000 and $37,000,000, respectively, was incurred under these agreements related to upfront and milestone payments under these agreements. As of December 31, 2025, the remaining contingent consideration payable pursuant to these agreements were not considered payable as the contingency is not resolved and therefore, no amount was accrued related to these contingent obligations during the year ended December 31, 2025.
Contract Manufacturing
The Company has entered into manufacturing agreements with respect to third-party contract manufacturers for its FDA approved pharmaceutical products. Some of these contract manufacturing agreements require minimum annual order amounts. The Company has committed to pay approximately $10,723,000 related to contract manufacturing agreements for the year ended December 31, 2026.
Want the next HARROW, INC. commitments disclosure the moment it drops?
Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment HARROW, INC.'s next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Mar 2, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 27, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 19, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 23, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 10, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 8, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 13, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 12, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 8, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 21, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Mar 23, 2016 | |
About Commitments Disclosures
Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.
Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.