Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements—In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (FASB) issued ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes—Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, in order to enhance the transparency and decision usefulness of income tax disclosures. ASU 2023-09 requires greater disaggregation of income tax disclosures related to the income tax rate reconciliation and income taxes paid. The Company adopted this new standard for the year ended December 31, 2025. These amendments have been applied retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. The required disclosure enhancements of ASU 2023-09 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. See Note 14 - Income Taxes for further details.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Not Yet Adopted)In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement (Subtopic 220-40)—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures, which requires disclosure of disaggregated income statement expense information about specific categories (including purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation, and intangible asset amortization) in the notes to financial statements. ASU 2024-03 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The guidance is applied on a prospective basis, with a retrospective option, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2024-03 on its consolidated financial statements.
In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326)—Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets. The amendments provide an optional practical expedient for estimated expected credit losses on current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from ASC 606 revenue transactions, allowing entities to assume that economic conditions at the balance sheet date will remain unchanged over the remaining life of the receivable. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2025, and are to be applied prospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2025-05 on its consolidated financial statements.
In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-07, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)—Derivatives Scope Refinements and Scope Clarification for Share-Based Noncash Consideration from a Customer in a Revenue Contract. The amendments clarify the scope of derivative accounting and the application of the revenue recognition guidance to share-based noncash consideration received from customers. The Company will early adopt ASU 2025-07 on January 1, 2026, using a prospective transition method, as permitted by the standard. The adoption of ASU 2025-07 will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 19, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 20, 2025
2023Feb 22, 2024
2022Feb 23, 2023
2021Feb 17, 2022
2020Feb 25, 2021
2019Feb 25, 2020
2018Feb 22, 2019
2017Feb 23, 2018
2016Feb 23, 2017
2015Feb 25, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.