Fair Value Measurements:

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company has evaluated the estimated fair value of financial instruments using available market information and valuations as provided by third-party sources. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies could have a significant effect on the estimated fair value amounts. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments.

Fair Value Hierarchy

The Company applies a three-level valuation hierarchy for fair value measurements. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on management’s assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset’s or liability’s fair value measurement classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table provides the assets carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis at January 3, 2026 and December 28, 2024:

 

 

Fair Value Measurements Using
Significant Other Observable
Inputs (Level 2)

 

 

 

January 3,
2026

 

 

December 28,
2024

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale debt securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Government notes and bonds

 

$

149,554

 

 

$

284,863

 

Certificates of deposit

 

 

47,338

 

 

 

73,421

 

Commercial paper

 

 

32,204

 

 

 

136,557

 

Corporate bonds

 

 

64,407

 

 

 

144,542

 

Foreign currency forward contracts

 

 

89

 

 

 

61

 

Total assets

 

$

293,592

 

 

$

639,444

 

Available-for-sale debt securities classified as Level 2 are valued using observable inputs to quoted market prices, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The foreign currency forward contracts are primarily measured based on the foreign currency spot and forward rates quoted by the banks or foreign currency dealers. Available-for-sale debt securities prices are obtained from third party pricing providers, which model prices utilizing the above observable inputs, for each asset class.

See Note 5 for additional discussion regarding the fair value of the Company’s marketable securities.

Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements

During the fiscal year ended January 3, 2026, the Company invested $8.0 million in the equity of a privately-held company. There were no such investments at December 28, 2024. This non-marketable equity investment is recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis and is classified as a Level 3 asset in “Other assets” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. This non-marketable equity investment is generally accounted for under the measurement alternative, defined as cost, less impairments, adjusted for subsequent observable price changes and is periodically assessed for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that decline in value may have occurred. As of January 3, 2026, there have been no impairments recorded for the non-marketable equity investment.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2026Feb 24, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 25, 2025
2023Feb 26, 2024
2022Feb 24, 2023
2020Feb 19, 2021
2019Feb 25, 2020
2018Feb 25, 2019
2017Feb 26, 2018
2016Mar 3, 2017
2015Feb 24, 2016

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.