Recently Issued Accounting Standards

 

In November 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures (ASU 2023-07). The update requires enhanced disclosures about significant segment expenses, enhanced interim disclosure requirements, clarification for when multiple segment measures of profit or loss can be disclosed and other requirements intended to improve overall reportable segment disclosures in annual and interim periods. ASU 2023-07 became effective in the annual period beginning on January 1, 2024 and became effective for interim periods beginning on January 1, 2025 with retrospective application to all prior periods presented. ASU 2023-07 did not have a material impact on disclosures, as the Company operates as a single segment and reporting unit.

 

In December 2023, the FASB issued ASU No. 2023-09, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (ASU 2023-09). ASU 2023-09 requires additional annual disclosures including further disaggregation of information in the rate reconciliation, additional information for reconciling items meeting a quantitative threshold, further disaggregation of income taxes paid and other required disclosures. ASU 2023-09 became effective for the Company in the annual period beginning on January 1, 2025 with retrospective application to all prior periods presented. ASU 2023-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s income tax disclosures or financial statements.

 

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income StatementReporting Comprehensive Income-Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40): Disaggregation of Income Statement Expenses, to provide investors with more decision-useful information about a public business entity’s expense by improving disclosures on income statement expenses. The amendments in the ASU are effective for public business entities only for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and for interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company does not anticipate this ASU will have a material impact on its financial statements.

 

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06, IntangiblesGoodwill and OtherInternal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software (ASU 2025-06). ASU 2025-06 removes all references to project stages and requires entities to capitalize costs associated with internal-use software based on a new methodology, which focuses on management’s authorization and commitment to funding the project and the probability that the software will be completed and used to perform the function intended. ASU 2025-06 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and for interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period. The guidance can be applied prospectively, retrospectively, or by a modified transition approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this ASU will have on its financial statements.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 25, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 31, 2025
2023Apr 1, 2024
2022Mar 29, 2023
2021Mar 31, 2022
2020Mar 31, 2021
2019Mar 13, 2020
2018Mar 11, 2019
2017Mar 15, 2018
2016Mar 27, 2017
2015Mar 30, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.