Fair Value Measurements
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present information about the Company’s financial assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
January 31, 2026
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets:
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds$308,535 $— $— $308,535 
Total cash equivalents$308,535 $— $— $308,535 
January 31, 2025
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets:
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds$81,972 $— $— $81,972 
Total cash equivalents$81,972 $— $— $81,972 
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration$— $— $5,700 $5,700 
Total liabilities$— $— $5,700 $5,700 
The Company’s carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses are considered Level 1 and approximate their fair values due to their short maturities as of January 31, 2026 and January 31, 2025 and are excluded from the fair value tables above. The carrying value of debt at January 31, 2025 is considered Level 1 and approximates fair value.
The Company measured the fair value of the contingent consideration associated with its Imprivata acquisition on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs, classified as Level 3. The Company recorded the contingent consideration at its fair value on the acquisition date. The Company determined the fair value of contingent consideration using a probability weighted discounted cash flow method. Each reporting period thereafter, the obligation is revalued and changes in its fair values are recorded within sales and marketing expenses within the consolidated statements of operations. Changes in the fair
value of the contingent consideration can result from changes in assumed discount periods and rates and from changes pertaining to the estimated or actual achievement of the defined milestones. Significant judgment is employed in determining the appropriateness of these assumptions as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent period. Accordingly, future business and economic conditions, as well as changes in any of the assumptions described above, can materially impact the fair value and corresponding changes in fair value of the contingent consideration the Company records in any given period.
During the year ended January 31, 2026, the Company remeasured the fair value of the contingent consideration associated with the Imprivata acquisition of $5.7 million reported as of January 31, 2025. This remeasurement resulted in a $1.6 million increase to the obligation, with the additional expense recorded in sales and marketing expenses within the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended January 31, 2026. The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined using a 99% probability of achievement with no additional discount rate due to the short-term expected timing of payment. The contingent consideration balance of $7.3 million was fully settled during August 2025.
The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration associated with the Imprivata acquisition was determined with the following key inputs:
January 31, 2025
Probability of achievement
84.2 %
Expected timing of payment
Fiscal 2026
Discount rate
13.5 %
The estimated fair value of the contingent consideration of $0.2 million associated with the Savvy Security Ltd. acquisition was determined using a 100% probability of achievement as of December 31, 2025 and as of the acquisition date. Prior to January 31, 2026, the contingency was satisfied and the liability was fully settled. See Note 5 for additional information on the Savvy acquisition.
There were no transfers between fair value measurement levels during the period ended January 31, 2026 and January 31, 2025.

About Fair Value Disclosures

Fair value disclosures classify all assets and liabilities measured at fair value into a three-level hierarchy: Level 1 (quoted market prices), Level 2 (observable inputs like yield curves), and Level 3 (unobservable inputs requiring management estimates). The proportion of Level 3 assets directly reflects how much of the balance sheet depends on internal models rather than market evidence.

Key signals: a growing Level 3 balance relative to total fair-value assets increases valuation uncertainty and earnings volatility risk. Watch for transfers between levels — assets moving from Level 2 to Level 3 often signal deteriorating market liquidity. Unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 positions flow through earnings or other comprehensive income, so large swings deserve scrutiny. For financial institutions, examine the sensitivity disclosures that show how Level 3 valuations change under alternative assumptions. Compare the fair value of debt against its carrying amount to gauge hidden leverage.