Leases
In August 2019, the Company leased office space for its headquarters location under an operating lease. This lease commenced in November 2019 after the completion of certain tenant improvements made by the lessor. The lease included an option to renew for a five-year term as well as an option to terminate after three years, neither of which was recognized as part of its related right of use assets or lease liabilities as their election was not considered reasonably certain. In November 2022, the Company entered into a second amendment to the lease, (i) to reduce the square footage and (ii) to extend the lease term, which constituted a modification event under ASC 842 and, the lease classification for the asset remains as an operating lease. Further, the second amendment to the lease does not include any material residual value guarantee or restrictive covenants. In November 2025, the Company did not renew its leased office space and the related lease expired with no remaining lease obligations.
As of December 31, 2024, the Company's operating leases had a weighted average remaining lease term of 0.9 years and a weighted average incremental borrowing rate of 9.5%.
Operating lease cost was $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, cash paid for operating leases was $0.2 million.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 10, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 20, 2025
2023Mar 13, 2024
2022Mar 6, 2023
2021Mar 29, 2022
2020Feb 24, 2021
2019Feb 21, 2020

About Leases Disclosures

Lease disclosures under ASC 842 provide a comprehensive view of a company's leased asset portfolio, including the split between operating and finance leases, discount rates used to present-value future payments, and the maturity schedule of lease obligations. This section reveals a significant source of off-balance-sheet commitments that were largely hidden before the current standard.

Key signals: the weighted-average discount rate affects the size of recorded lease liabilities — a higher rate reduces the reported obligation, so compare the chosen rate against the company's incremental borrowing rate. The operating versus finance lease mix affects both EBITDA and operating income presentation. Watch the maturity table for concentration risk: large payment cliffs in specific years may create cash flow pressure. Variable lease payments excluded from the liability measurement represent real obligations that do not appear on the balance sheet. Compare total lease costs against prior-year operating lease expense to assess the true economic burden.