S. Contingencies and Commitments

Contingencies

Environmental Matters

Alcoa Corporation participates in environmental assessments and cleanups at several locations. These include currently or previously owned or operated facilities and adjoining properties, and waste sites, including Superfund (Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA)) sites.

Alcoa Corporation’s environmental remediation reserve balance reflects the most probable costs to remediate identified environmental conditions for which costs can be reasonably estimated. The following table details the changes in the carrying value of recorded environmental remediation reserves:

Balance at December 31, 2022

$

284

 

Liabilities incurred

 

39

 

Cash payments

 

(55

)

Reversals of previously recorded liabilities

 

(1

)

Foreign currency translation and other

 

1

 

Balance at December 31, 2023

 

268

 

Liabilities incurred

 

25

 

Cash payments

 

(49

)

Reversals of previously recorded liabilities

 

(12

)

Foreign currency translation and other

 

(12

)

Balance at December 31, 2024

 

220

 

Liabilities incurred

 

85

 

Cash payments

 

(25

)

Reversals of previously recorded liabilities

 

(2

)

Foreign currency translation and other

 

4

 

Balance at December 31, 2025

$

282

 

At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the current portion of the remediation reserve balance was $76 and $38, respectively.

In 2025, the Company incurred liabilities of $85 and recorded a reversal of $2. The impacts to the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations were primarily:

$27 for enforceable undertakings with the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) at the Huntly mine which was recorded in Cost of goods sold;
$25 related to subsurface remediation, investigation of potential site contamination, transportation of refinery waste, and ground water monitoring due to the closure of the Kwinana refinery which was recorded in Restructuring and other charges, net;
$13 for increases in estimated scope and costs associated with ongoing remediation work at previously closed sites which was recorded in Restructuring and other charges, net;
$9 related to investigation of potential contamination at various sites in Australia which was recorded in Cost of goods sold;
$5 for certain other environmental compliance matters which was recorded in Cost of goods sold;
$6 for increases in estimated scope and costs associated with ongoing remediation work at various other sites which was recorded in Cost of goods sold; and,
($2) due to the determination that certain site remediation at a previously closed site was no longer required which was recorded in Restructuring and other charges, net.

 

In 2024, the Company incurred liabilities of $25 and recorded a reversal of $12. The impacts to the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations were primarily:

$20 for an increase in estimated scope and costs associated with ongoing remediation work at several sites and for certain other environmental compliance matters which were recorded in Cost of goods sold;
$5 for an increase in estimated costs associated with ongoing remediation work at previously closed sites which were recorded to Restructuring and other charges, net (see Note D); and,
$12 reversal for site remediation that is no longer required at a previously closed site which was recorded in Restructuring and other charges, net (see Note D).

In 2023, the Company incurred liabilities of $39 and recorded a reversal of $1. The impacts to the accompanying Statement of Consolidated Operations were primarily:

$14 for the closure of the previously curtailed Intalco smelter and $13 for an increase in estimated costs associated with ongoing remediation work at the previously closed Longview (Washington) site which were recorded in Restructuring and other charges, net (see Note D);
$12 for an increase in estimated costs associated with ongoing remediation work at various other sites which was recorded in Cost of goods sold; and,
$1 reversal due to the determination that certain remaining site remediation was no longer required which was recorded in Restructuring and other charges, net (see Note D).

Cash payments include mandated expenditures as well as those not required by any regulatory authority or third party. The estimated timing of cash outflows from the environmental remediation reserve at December 31, 2025 was as follows:

2026

$

76

 

2027 – 2030

 

120

 

Thereafter

 

86

 

Total

$

282

 

Reserve balances at December 31, 2025 and 2024, associated with significant sites with active remediation underway or for future remediation were $202 and $154, respectively. In management’s judgment, the Company’s reserves are sufficient to satisfy the provisions of the respective action plans. Upon changes in facts or circumstances, a change to the reserve may be required. The Company’s significant sites include:

Huntly, Australia—The reserve associated with enforceable undertakings with the DCCEEW relates to mining activities for the period from 2019 to 2025 at the Huntly mine. Under the terms of the enforceable undertakings, Alcoa is required to provide $36 (A$55) for investments in environmental offsets to counterbalance impacts caused by mine development and the funding of various conservation programs. Associated cash outlays are expected in 2026.

Kwinana, Australia—The reserve associated with the 2025 closure of the Kwinana refinery is for subsurface remediation, investigation of potential site contamination, transportation of refinery waste, and ground water monitoring. Remediation work is expected to begin in 2026. The final remediation plan is currently being developed, which may result in a change to the existing reserve.

Suriname—The reserve associated with the 2017 closure of the Suralco refinery and bauxite mine is for treatment and disposal of refinery waste and soil remediation. The work began in 2017 and is expected to be completed by the end of 2030.

Massena, New York—The reserve associated with the 2015 closure of the Massena East smelter by the Company’s subsidiary, Reynolds Metals Company, is for subsurface soil remediation to be performed after demolition of the structures. Remediation work commenced in 2021 and will take up to eight years to complete.

Point Comfort, Texas—The reserve associated with the 2019 closure of the Point Comfort alumina refinery is for disposal of industrial wastes contained at the site, subsurface remediation, and post-closure monitoring and maintenance. The final remediation plan is currently being developed, which may result in a change to the existing reserve.

Addy, Washington—The reserve associated with the 2022 closure of the Addy magnesium smelter facility is for site-wide remediation and investigation and post-closure monitoring and maintenance. Remediation work is not expected to begin until 2027 and will take three to five years to complete. The final remediation plan is currently being developed, which may result in a change to the existing reserve.

Ferndale, Washington—The reserve associated with the 2023 closure of the Intalco aluminum smelter in Ferndale, Washington is for subsurface remediation and post-closure maintenance and monitoring. The final remediation plan is under review.

Other Sites—The Company is in the process of decommissioning various other plants and remediating sites in several countries for potential redevelopment or to return the land to a natural state. In aggregate, there are remediation projects at 31 other sites that are planned or underway. These activities will be completed at various times in the future over the next two to four years, after which ongoing monitoring and other activities may be required. At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the reserve balance associated with these activities was $80 and $66, respectively.

Tax

Brazil (AWAB)—Under Brazilian law, taxpayers who generate non-cumulative federal value added tax credits related to exempt exports may either request a refund in cash (monetization) or offset them against other federal taxes owed. In 2012, AWAB requested monetization of $136 (R$273) from the Brazilian Federal Revenue Office (RFB) and received $68 (R$136) that year. In March 2013, AWAB was notified by the RFB that approximately $110 (R$220) of value added tax credits previously claimed were being disallowed and a penalty of 50 percent was assessed. $41 (R$82) of the cash received in 2012 related to the disallowed amount. The value added tax credits were claimed by AWAB for both fixed assets and export sales related to the Juruti bauxite mine and Alumar refinery expansion for tax years 2009 through 2011. The RFB has disallowed credits they allege belong to the consortium in which AWAB owns an interest and should not have been claimed by AWAB. Credits have also been disallowed as a result of challenges to apportionment methods used, questions about the use of the credits, and an alleged lack of documented proof. AWAB presented defense of its claim to the RFB on April 8, 2013.

In February 2022, the RFB notified AWAB that it had inspected the value added tax credits claimed for 2012 and disallowed $4 (R$19). In its decision, the RFB allowed credits of $14 (R$65) that were similar to those previously disallowed for 2009 through 2011. In July 2022, the RFB notified AWAB that it had inspected the value added tax credits claimed for 2013 and disallowed $13 (R$66). In its decision, the RFB allowed credits of $10 (R$53) that were similar to those previously disallowed for 2009 through 2011. In September 2024, the RFB notified AWAB that it had further inspected the value added tax credits claimed for 2013 and issued a first administrative decision allowing additional credits of $1 (R$5) that were similar to those previously disallowed for 2009 through 2011. AWAB received the 2012 allowed credits with interest of $9 (R$44) in March 2022, the 2013 allowed credits with interest of $6 (R$31) in August 2022, and the additional 2013 allowed credits with interest of $1 (R$6) in December 2024. The decisions on the 2012 and 2013 credits provide positive evidence to support management’s opinion that there is no basis for these credits to be disallowed. AWAB will continue to dispute the credits that were disallowed for 2012 and 2013. If AWAB is successful in this administrative process, the RFB would have no further recourse. If unsuccessful in this process, AWAB has the option to litigate at a judicial level. Separately from AWAB’s administrative appeal, in June 2015, a new tax law was enacted repealing the provisions in the tax code that were the basis for the RFB assessing a 50 percent penalty in this matter. As such, the estimated range of reasonably possible loss for these matters is $0 to $54 (R$300). It is management’s opinion that the allegations have no basis; however, at this time, the Company is unable to reasonably predict an outcome for this matter.

Australia (AofA)—On April 30, 2025 (the decision date), the ART issued its decision related to the proceedings AofA filed against the ATO in April 2022 to contest the Notices of Assessment (the Notices) issued by the ATO in July 2020 (described below) related to transfer pricing of certain historic third-party alumina sales. The ART decided that no additional tax is owed, consistent with Alcoa’s long-held position related to this matter.

The Notices asserted claims for income tax payable by AofA of approximately $152 (A$214) and claims for compounded interest on the tax amount totaling approximately $502 (A$707). In addition to the Notices, the ATO issued a position paper in September 2020 with its preliminary view on the imposition of administrative penalties related to the tax assessment which proposed penalties of approximately $91 (A$128).

In accordance with the ATO’s dispute resolution practices, AofA paid 50 percent of the assessed income tax amount exclusive of interest and any penalties, or $74 (A$107), during the third quarter 2020. The prepaid tax asset of $66 (A$107) was included within Other noncurrent assets at December 31, 2024.

Interest on the unpaid tax was accrued through the decision date, which, along with the initial interest assessment, was deductible against taxable income by AofA. AofA applied this deduction beginning in the third quarter of 2020 through the decision date, resulting in reductions in cash tax payments. The accrued tax liability of $225 (A$346) was reclassified to Taxes, including income taxes in June 2025 as these amounts are due by June 1, 2026 and will be paid in accordance with the payment schedule applicable to Alcoas Australian tax group. The accrued tax liability of $206 (A$332) was included within Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits at December 31, 2024.

The ATO did not appeal the ART’s decision and the disputed tax claims (and additional related interest and penalties) were withdrawn. The related prepaid tax asset of $69 (A$107) and interest of $9 (A$13) were refunded to AofA in July 2025, and accrued cash taxes of $225 (A$346) related to the interest deductions were reclassified to Taxes, including income taxes in June 2025 as these amounts are payable by AofA by June 1, 2026. The net cash impact of both the refunded amount and the accrued cash taxes is approximately $152 (A$226). This matter is now closed in Alcoa’s favor.

References to any assessed U.S. dollar amounts presented in connection with this matter have been converted into U.S. dollars from Australian dollars based on the exchange rate in the respective period.

General

In addition to the matters discussed above, various other lawsuits, claims, and proceedings have been or may be instituted or asserted against Alcoa Corporation, including those pertaining to environmental, safety and health, commercial, tax, product liability, intellectual property infringement, governance, employment, and employee and retiree benefit matters, and other actions and claims arising out of the normal course of business. While the amounts claimed in these other matters may be substantial, the ultimate liability is not readily determinable because of the considerable uncertainties that exist. Accordingly, it is possible that the Company’s liquidity or results of operations in a particular period could be materially affected by one or more of these other matters. However, based on facts currently available, management believes that the disposition of these other matters that are pending or asserted will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the financial position of the Company.

Commitments

Purchase Obligations. Alcoa Corporation is party to unconditional purchase obligations for energy that expire between 2040 and 2041. Commitments related to these contracts total $58 in 2026, $60 in 2027, $62 in 2028, $65 in 2029, $67 in 2030, and $773 thereafter. Expenditures under these contracts totaled $54 in 2025, $50 in 2024, and $53 in 2023. Additionally, the Company has entered into other purchase commitments for energy, raw materials, and other goods and services, which total $3,279 in 2026, $2,131 in 2027, $1,702 in 2028, $1,421 in 2029, $1,331 in 2030, and $7,702 thereafter.

AofA has a gas supply agreement to power its alumina refineries in Western Australia which began in July 2020 for a 12-year period. The terms of this agreement required AofA to make a prepayment of $500 prior to 2017. At December 31, 2025, prepayments of $37 and $207 were included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other noncurrent assets (see Note U), respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. At December 31, 2024, prepayments of $35 and $225 were included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and Other noncurrent assets (see Note U), respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Guarantees of Third Parties. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had no outstanding potential future payments for guarantees issued on behalf of a third party.

Bank Guarantees and Letters of Credit. Alcoa Corporation and its subsidiaries have outstanding bank guarantees and letters of credit related to, among others, energy contracts, environmental obligations, legal and tax matters, leasing obligations, workers compensation, and customs duties. The total amount committed under these instruments, which automatically renew or expire at various dates between 2026 and 2028, was $428 (includes $84 issued under a standby letter of credit agreement —see below) at December 31, 2025.

Alcoa Corporation’s former parent company Alcoa Inc. was renamed Arconic Inc. on November 1, 2016 and was subsequently renamed Howmet Aerospace Inc. (Howmet). Howmet has outstanding bank guarantees and letters of credit related to the Company of $10 at December 31, 2025. In the event Howmet would be required to perform under any of these instruments, Howmet would be indemnified by Alcoa Corporation in accordance with the Separation and Distribution Agreement dated October 31, 2016. Likewise, the Company has outstanding bank guarantees and letters of credit related to Howmet of $8 at December 31, 2025. In the event Alcoa Corporation would be required to perform under any of these instruments, the Company would be indemnified by Howmet in accordance with the Separation and Distribution Agreement dated October 31, 2016.

In December 2023, AofA committed to provide a bank guarantee in connection with the approval of the Company’s five-year mine plans that were referred to the Western Australia Environmental Protection Agency (WA EPA), which demonstrates Alcoa’s confidence that its operations will not impair drinking water supplies. On September 30, 2024 and October 1, 2024, AofA delivered bank guarantees totaling $67 (A$100). Alcoa may, with the Western Australian government’s consent, replace the bank guarantee with a parent company guarantee or a surety bond. The requirement to provide financial assurance will expire upon the completion of the WA EPA’s assessment of the Company’s five-year mine plans.

In August 2017, Alcoa Corporation entered into a standby letter of credit agreement with three financial institutions, which was most recently amended in May 2024 and expires on May 1, 2026. The agreement provides for a $200 facility used by the Company for matters in the ordinary course of business. Alcoa Corporation’s obligations under this facility are secured in the same manner as obligations under the Company’s revolving credit facility. Additionally, this facility contains similar representations and warranties and affirmative, negative, and financial covenants as the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility (see Note M). As of December 31, 2025, letters of credit aggregating $84 were issued under this facility.

 

Surety Bonds. Alcoa Corporation has outstanding surety bonds primarily related to tax matters, contract performance, workers compensation, environmental-related matters, and customs duties. The total amount committed under these bonds, which automatically renew or expire at various dates between 2026 and 2030, was $357 at December 31, 2025. Additionally, Howmet has outstanding surety bonds related to the Company of $6 at December 31, 2025. In the event Howmet would be required to perform under any of these instruments, Howmet would be indemnified by Alcoa Corporation in accordance with the Separation and Distribution Agreement dated October 31, 2016. Likewise, the Company has outstanding surety bonds related to Howmet of $9 at December 31, 2025. In the event Alcoa Corporation would be required to perform under any of these instruments, the Company would be indemnified by Howmet in accordance with the Separation and Distribution Agreement dated October 31, 2016.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Feb 26, 2026Showing above
2024Feb 20, 2025
2023Feb 21, 2024
2022Feb 23, 2023
2021Feb 24, 2022
2020Feb 25, 2021
2019Feb 21, 2020
2018Feb 26, 2019
2017Feb 26, 2018
2016Mar 15, 2017

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.