MANNATECH INC Income Taxes Disclosure
NOTE 8: INCOME TAXES
The components of the Company’s (loss) income before income taxes are attributable to the following jurisdictions for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
| 2025 | 2024 | |||||||
| United States | $ | (5,315 | ) | $ | 1 | |||
| Foreign | 2,426 | 3,739 | ||||||
| (Loss) income before income taxes | $ | (2,889 | ) | $ | 3,740 | |||
The components of the Company’s income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
| Current provision: | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Federal | $ | 170 | $ | 158 | ||||
| State | 14 | 11 | ||||||
| Foreign | 620 | 1,240 | ||||||
| 804 | 1,409 | |||||||
| Deferred provision (benefit): | ||||||||
| Federal | — | — | ||||||
| State | 79 | (47 | ) | |||||
| Foreign | 11,441 | (112 | ) | |||||
| 11,520 | (159 | ) | ||||||
| $ | 12,324 | $ | 1,250 | |||||
For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company’s effective tax rate was 426.6% and 33.4%, respectively. The Company's effective tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, differed from the statutory rate due to a mix of earnings across jurisdictions and the associated valuation allowance recorded on losses in certain jurisdictions. The 2025 effective tax rate of 426.6% was primarily driven by losses for which a full valuation allowance was recorded, combined with taxable income in foreign jurisdictions, resulting in tax expense despite consolidated pre-tax losses.
A reconciliation of the Company’s United States federal statutory income tax rate and effective income tax rate is summarized as follows, for the year ended December 31, 2025 (dollars in thousands):
| 2025 | ||||||||
| Federal statutory income taxes | 21.0 | % | $ | (607 | ) | |||
| State and Local income taxes, net of federal benefit(1) | 1.5 | (43 | ) | |||||
| Foreign Tax Effects: | ||||||||
| Deferred tax liability on unremitted foreign earnings | (337.5 | ) | 9,750 | |||||
| Withholding taxes | (5.9 | ) | 170 | |||||
| Changes in foreign tax credits | 0.4 | (12 | ) | |||||
| Difference in Foreign and U.S tax on foreign operations | (1.5 | ) | 42 | |||||
| Changes in valuation allowance | (99.0 | ) | 2,859 | |||||
| Non-taxable or Non-deductible items: | ||||||||
| Nondeductible Entertainment | (5.5 | ) | 159 | |||||
| Other | (3.3 | ) | 96 | |||||
| Other | 3.1 | (90 | ) | |||||
| (426.6 | )% | $ | 12,324 | |||||
(1) State taxes in Texas, New Jersey and Oregon make up the majority (greater than 50%) of the tax effect of this category.
The adoption of ASU 2023-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements but expanded required rate reconciliation disclosures. The following table presents the required disclosures prior to the Company's adoption of ASU 2023-09 and reconciles the Company’s effective income tax rate and the United States federal statutory income tax rate, for the year ended December 31, 2024:
| 2024 | ||||
| Federal statutory income taxes | 21.0 | % | ||
| State income taxes, net of federal benefit | 0.2 | |||
| Withholding taxes | 4.3 | |||
| Changes in foreign tax credits | 82.2 | |||
| Difference in foreign and United States tax on foreign operations | 2.2 | |||
| Permanent difference | 8.3 | |||
| Changes in valuation allowance | (80.5 | ) | ||
| State deferred tax | (5.6 | ) | ||
| Prior year Adjustments/Deferred Adjustments | 1.0 | |||
| Other | 0.3 | |||
| 33.4 | % | |||
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The decrease in net deferred tax assets was primarily driven by an increase in valuation allowance and foreign deferred tax liabilities. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):
| Deferred tax assets: | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue | $ | 116 | $ | 238 | ||||
| Inventory | 218 | 287 | ||||||
| Accrued expenses | 1,892 | 1,683 | ||||||
| Net operating loss (1) | 5,736 | 4,668 | ||||||
| Equity compensation | 262 | 290 | ||||||
| Foreign tax credit carryover | 225 | 213 | ||||||
| Lease liability | 828 | 725 | ||||||
| Capitalized research & development | 888 | 1,100 | ||||||
| Unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses | 457 | 53 | ||||||
| Other | 477 | 759 | ||||||
| Total deferred tax assets | $ | 11,099 | $ | 10,016 | ||||
| Valuation allowance | (9,721 | ) | (6,862 | ) | ||||
| Total deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance | $ | 1,378 | $ | 3,154 | ||||
| Deferred tax liabilities: | ||||||||
| Prepaid expenses | 257 | 281 | ||||||
| Deferred commissions | 325 | 364 | ||||||
| Lease assets | 766 | 684 | ||||||
| Fixed assets | 30 | 55 | ||||||
| Deferred tax liability on unremitted foreign earnings | 9,750 | — | ||||||
| Total deferred tax liabilities | $ | 11,128 | $ | 1,384 | ||||
| Total net deferred tax (liability) asset | $ | (9,750 | ) | $ | 1,770 | |||
(1)The Company’s net operating loss will expire as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
| Jurisdiction | Gross NOL | Tax Effected NOL | Expiration Years | |||||||||
| Cyprus | $ | 1,577 | $ | 197 | 2026 - 2029 | |||||||
| Mexico | 6,018 | 1,805 | 2026 - 2030 | |||||||||
| Switzerland | 5,475 | 429 | 2026 - 2031 | |||||||||
| United States - Federal | 7,318 | 1,529 | Indefinite | |||||||||
| United States - State | 16,121 | 1,113 | 2026 - Indefinite | |||||||||
| Other - Foreign | 3,191 | 663 | Indefinite | |||||||||
We have U.S. foreign tax credit carryforwards of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2025. The Company maintains a valuation allowance of $0.2 million against its foreign tax credit carryforwards. A significant portion of these net operating loss carryforwards are subject to valuation allowances due to uncertainty regarding their realization, particularly in jurisdictions with cumulative losses.
The Company recorded a deferred tax liability of $9.7 million related to the estimated tax cost associated with unremitted earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries. This liability reflects the expected tax consequences of repatriation of such earnings.
At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company’s valuation allowance was $9.7 million and $6.9 million, respectively. The net change in the valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 was an increase of $2.8 million and a decrease of $3.4 million, respectively. The provisions of ASC Topic 740 require a company to record a valuation allowance when the “more likely than not” criterion for realizing a deferred tax asset cannot be met. A company is to use judgment in reviewing both positive and negative evidence of realizing a deferred tax asset. Furthermore, the weight given to the potential effect of such evidence is commensurate with the extent the evidence can be objectively verified. The valuation allowance against the Company's deferred tax assets consisted of the following at December 31 (in millions):
| Country | 2025 | 2024 | ||||||
| Cyprus | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.2 | ||||
| Mexico | 1.8 | 1.8 | ||||||
| Norway | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||
| Switzerland | 0.4 | 0.3 | ||||||
| Gibraltar | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||
| Thailand | 0.2 | 0.1 | ||||||
| United States | 5.4 | 4.3 | ||||||
| Australia | 0.1 | — | ||||||
| Japan | 0.3 | — | ||||||
| United Kingdom | 0.1 | — | ||||||
| Korea | 0.5 | — | ||||||
| South Africa | 0.1 | — | ||||||
| China | 0.4 | — | ||||||
| Total | $ | 9.7 | $ | 6.9 | ||||
At December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company paid income taxes (net of refunds received) in the amount of $0.4 million and $0.8 million, respectively. The income taxes (net of refunds received), consisted of the following at December 31, 2025 (in thousands):
| 2025 | ||||
| U.S. Federal | $ | - | ||
| U.S. State | ||||
| Massachusetts | 1 | |||
| Minnesota | - | |||
| New Jersey | 2 | |||
| New York | - | |||
| Texas | 6 | |||
| Other - State | 2 | |||
| State Subtotal | $ | 11 | ||
| Foreign | ||||
| Australia | $ | - | ||
| China | - | |||
| Japan | (137 | ) | ||
| Korea | 523 | |||
| Other - Foreign | 32 | |||
| Foreign Subtotal | $ | 418 | ||
| Income taxes paid, net | $ | 429 | ||
As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits.
The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to uncertain tax positions in current income tax expense. As of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the Company had no accrued interest and penalties in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities in the United States and various state and foreign jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2025, the tax years that remained subject to examination by a major tax jurisdiction for the Company’s most significant subsidiaries were as follows:
| Jurisdiction | Open Years | ||
| China | 2020 - 2024 | ||
| Japan | 2020 - 2024 | ||
| Republic of Korea | 2020 - 2024 | ||
| Switzerland | 2021 - 2024 | ||
| United States | 2022 - 2024 |
Historical Timeline
| Fiscal Year | Filed | |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Apr 15, 2026 | Showing above |
| 2024 | Mar 26, 2025 | |
| 2023 | Mar 28, 2024 | |
| 2022 | Mar 17, 2023 | |
| 2021 | Mar 15, 2022 | |
| 2020 | Mar 19, 2021 | |
| 2019 | Mar 26, 2020 | |
| 2018 | Mar 11, 2019 | |
| 2017 | Mar 26, 2018 | |
| 2016 | Mar 14, 2017 | |
| 2015 | Mar 15, 2016 | |
About Income Taxes Disclosures
The income tax disclosure reveals how much a company actually pays in taxes versus what the statutory rate would predict. Analysts focus on the effective tax rate (ETR) reconciliation, which breaks down every item driving the gap between the 21% federal rate and the company's reported ETR — including R&D credits, foreign rate differentials, and state taxes. Deferred tax assets (DTAs) and their valuation allowances signal management's confidence in future profitability: a rising allowance suggests the company doubts it can use accumulated tax benefits. Uncertain tax benefit (UTB) reserves quantify exposure to IRS challenges on aggressive positions.
Key signals to watch: sudden ETR drops without clear operational reasons, large increases in valuation allowances, growing UTB balances, and significant unremitted foreign earnings. Post-TCJA, pay attention to GILTI and BEAT provisions that affect multinational tax structures. Compare the cash taxes paid (from the cash flow statement) against the income tax provision to gauge earnings quality.