Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

 

Income Tax Reporting (ASU 2023-09) — Income Taxes (Topic 740): Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures (“ASU 2023-09”). In December 2023, the FASB issued accounting guidance to expand the annual disclosure requirements for income taxes, primarily related to the rate reconciliation and income taxes paid, including disaggregated information about federal, state, and foreign income taxes. The Company adopted ASU 2023-09, on a prospective basis, effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2025. The adoption did not have an impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements but resulted in enhanced income tax disclosures within the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

 

Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Effective

 

Income Statement Expenses (ASU 2024-03) — Income Statement (Subtopic 220-40) - Reporting Comprehensive Income - Expense Disaggregation Disclosures. In November 2024, the FASB issued accounting guidance which is intended to improve expense disclosures, primarily by requiring disclosure of disaggregated information about certain income statement expense line items on an annual and interim basis. The ASU does not change the expense captions an entity presents on the face of the income statement; rather, it requires disaggregation of certain expense captions into specified categories in disclosures within the footnotes to the financial statements. ASU 2024-03 becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. The Company is currently evaluating the disclosure impacts of ASU 2024-03 on its consolidated financial statements as well as the impacts to its financial reporting process and related internal controls

 

Credit Losses (ASU 2025-05) — Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326) - Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets. In July 2025, the FASB issued accounting guidance which introduces a practical expedient for the application of the current expected credit loss ("CECL") model to current accounts receivable and contract assets. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2025, on a prospective basis, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact given the short-term nature of its accounts receivable.

 

Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (ASU 2025-06) (Subtopic 350-40Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-Use Software. In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, which provides targeted improvements to the accounting for internal-use software. The amendments are intended to modernize and simplify the guidance by aligning it more closely with the economic substance of software development activities. The amendments are effective for all entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual reporting period for which financial statements have not yet been issued or made available for issuance. If early adoption is elected in an interim period, the entity must adopt the amendments as of the beginning of the annual reporting period that includes that interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2025-06 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

Interim Reporting — (ASU 2025-11) (Topic 270) - Narrow-Scope Improvements. In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11 to clarify when ASC 270 applies by specifying that it is required for entities that provide a full set of interim financial statements and notes in accordance with U.S GAAP. The ASU also introduces a comprehensive list of required interim disclosures and adds a disclosure principle requiring companies to report events occurring after the prior annual reporting period that have a material impact on interim results. The amendments are effective for public business entities for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027.  Early adoption is permitted, and entities may apply the guidance prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2025-11 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

 

Codification Improvements — (ASU 2025-12). In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-12 as part of its ongoing project to make technical corrections, clarifications, and other incremental improvements across numerous areas of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments are to enhance clarity and consistency in applying U.S GAAP. ASU-2025-12 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2026, with early adoption permitted. Certain EPS related amendments must be applied retrospectively, while others may be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2025-12 on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Apr 15, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 26, 2025
2023Mar 28, 2024
2022Mar 17, 2023
2021Mar 15, 2022
2020Mar 19, 2021
2019Mar 26, 2020
2018Mar 11, 2019
2017Mar 26, 2018
2016Mar 14, 2017
2015Mar 15, 2016

About New Standards Disclosures

New accounting standards disclosures describe recently adopted pronouncements and those not yet effective, along with management's assessment of their expected impact. This section provides an early warning system for upcoming changes to how a company reports its financial results, often years before the new rules take effect.

Key signals: when management describes a not-yet-adopted standard's impact as "material" or "still being evaluated," it signals potential significant changes to reported metrics upon adoption. Watch for standards that affect a company's core operations — for example, revenue recognition changes for software companies or lease accounting changes for retailers with large store footprints. The transition method chosen (full retrospective versus modified retrospective) affects comparability with prior periods. Companies that delay adoption to the latest permitted date may be struggling with implementation complexity. Compare the disclosed impact assessments against peers in the same industry to gauge whether management's expectations are reasonable.