Commitments and Contingencies
(a)     Legal Matters
The Company is subject to various claims and legal proceedings covering matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities, including product liability claims. Management believes that any liability that may ultimately result from the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. Please see Note 17(e) and (f) below for details regarding legal proceedings pending with Company suppliers.
(b)     Research Agreement
Effective September 1, 2016, the Company is party to a research agreement with a third party, which is also a Company stockholder, whereby the third party will perform research activity as specified annually by the Company. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company paid a minimum of $400,000 annually in equal quarterly installments. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, $122,928 and $124,000, respectively, were paid under the research agreement. At December 31, 2025, we have $94,785 remaining to be paid under the agreement.
(c) In-Licensing
The Company is a party to a licensing agreement for non-exclusive rights to intellectual property which will expire at the later of the date at which the last patent underlying the intellectual property expires or 20 years from the sale of the first licensed product. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will pay up to an aggregate of $700,000 in royalties upon achievement of certain milestones. As of December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, no royalty expenses had been incurred under this agreement.
The licensing agreement was replaced in November 2017, the Company executed an agreement ("IP Acquisition Agreement") with the University of Delaware (Seller) whereby all right, title, and interest in the licensed intellectual property was assigned to the Company in exchange for an upfront fee of $500,000 and the Company's common shares valued at $1,491,556. The total acquisition cost of $1,991,556 was capitalized and is being amortized over the fifteen years expected life of the patents underlying the intellectual property. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will pay up to an aggregate $7,500,000 in royalties to the Seller upon achievement of milestones, related to the aggregate number of vehicles that have had access to the Company’s GIVe platform system for a period of at least 6 consecutive months, and for which the Company has received monetary consideration for such access pursuant to a subscription or other similar agreement with the vehicle’s owner as follows:
Milestone Event: Aggregated VehiclesMilestone
Payment Amount
10,000$500,000 
20,000750,000 
40,000750,000 
60,000750,000 
80,000750,000 
100,0001,000,000 
200,0001,000,000 
250,0002,000,000 
$7,500,000 
The Seller will retain a non-exclusive, royalty-free license, to utilize the intellectual property solely for research and education purposes. As of December 31, 2025, no royalty expenses had been incurred under this agreement.
(d)     Investment
Due to sale of the Company's investment in Dreev, it is no longer committed to possible future additional contributions to the Investment in Dreev (Note 6) in the amount of $270,000.
(e)Purchase Commitments
On July 20, 2021, Nuvve issued a purchase order (“PO”) to its supplier, Rhombus Energy Solutions, Inc. (“Rhombus”), for a quantity of DC Chargers and dispensers for EVs (“DC Chargers”), for a total price of $13.2 million. A dispute (the "Dispute")
arose as to the PO, and an arbitration proceeding was initiated.
On February 2, 2024 (the “Settlement Date”), the Company and Rhombus entered into a settlement and release agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) pursuant to which, among other things, the Company agreed to pay Rhombus approximately $0.46 million for certain initial DC Chargers within 15 days from the Settlement Date. The Company further agreed to pay Rhombus an aggregate of $2.40 million for certain DC Chargers upon shipment with payments correlating to the amounts shipped due prior to shipment, a minimum of 50% of which shall be paid within 12 months after the Settlement date, with the remaining balance, if any, to be paid within 24 months after the Settlement Date. The Settlement Agreement further provides for the dismissal of the legal action as to the Company and Rhombus. The Company and Rhombus agreed to release one another from any and all claims relating to the Dispute.
On February 21, 2025, the Company initiated a legal action against Rhombus related to its refusal to honor certain warranty and commissioning obligations with respect to DC Chargers the Company purchased from Rhombus. Rhombus has in turn filed a demand for an arbitration claiming that the Company breached terms of the previous settlement agreement between the Company and Rhombus by failing to purchase additional DC Chargers. The Company believes it has no obligation to purchase additional non-conforming DC Chargers. Therefore, the Company believes that Rhombus’s position does not have any merit, and it intends to exercise all available rights and remedies in its legal action against Rhombus. The outcome of any such proceedings are inherently uncertain, and the amount and/or timing of any gains or expenses resulting from such proceedings is not reasonably estimable at this time.

(f)Fleet Electrification Program
On February 11, 2026, the Company determined that the master services agreement, dated May 14, 2024 (the “Fresno Agreement”), by and between the Company and Fresno Economic Opportunities Commission (the “FEOC”) had been effectively terminated and provided notice to the FEOC of costs and amounts owed to the Company in connection with the termination. As previously disclosed, the Fresno Agreement outlined the general scope of work, timeline, and pricing pursuant to which the Company was to provide services and materials to the FEOC in connection with the FEOC’s fleet electrification program. The total possible estimated fees and expenses payable to the Company by FEOC for services and materials provided in relation to the project under the Fresno Agreement was approximately $15.7 million. The termination followed extensive discussions between the Company and the FEOC regarding the Fresno Agreement and the FEOC’s willingness to continue pursuing its fleet electrification project. Despite the Company’s substantial efforts to accommodate the FEOC’s requests and procuring multiple alternative options to fulfill certain funding obligations under the Fresno Agreement, the FEOC was unwilling to move forward with the project. The Company disputes whether the FEOC properly terminated the Fresno Agreement pursuant to its terms and has reserved its rights with respect thereto. However, as a practical matter, the Company no longer reasonably believes that the business relationship contemplated by the Fresno Agreement will continue. The Company is currently in negotiations with the FEOC to determine the amount of costs and fees owed to the Company for services provided prior to the date of termination, as it is entitled to under the Fresno Agreement. There can be no assurance as to the amount the Company will ultimately receive from the FEOC for services provided under the Fresno Agreement prior to the date of termination.
Free Sentinel

Want the next Nuvve Holding Corp. commitments disclosure the moment it drops?

Set a Sentinel and we'll alert you the moment Nuvve Holding Corp.'s next filing hits EDGAR. No credit card, your email never gets sold.

Track for free

Historical Timeline

Fiscal YearFiled
2025Mar 31, 2026Showing above
2024Mar 31, 2025
2023Mar 29, 2024
2022Mar 31, 2023
2021Mar 31, 2022

About Commitments Disclosures

Commitments and contingencies disclosures catalog a company's off-balance-sheet obligations and legal exposures — purchase commitments, guarantee arrangements, pending litigation, and regulatory proceedings. These items represent potential future cash outflows that may not appear as liabilities on the balance sheet until they become probable and estimable.

Key signals: litigation reserves and disclosed loss ranges quantify management's estimate of legal exposure, but unquantified "reasonably possible" losses often represent the larger risk. Watch for changes in language around pending cases — shifts from "remote" to "reasonably possible" or increases in estimated loss ranges signal deteriorating outcomes. Unconditional purchase obligations and take-or-pay contracts create fixed cost structures that reduce operational flexibility. Guarantee arrangements for subsidiaries or joint ventures can create cascading obligations. Compare the total commitment schedule against projected free cash flow to assess whether the company can meet its obligations without additional financing.